HUBBARD COIdJdUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Wanor. East Grinstead. Sussex 
RCO BULLETIN OF 3 APRIL 1981 
Remimeo 
DeSI Delivery Course Checksheet Qualified 
DeSI C/Ses 
CIS Series 112 Dianetic Clear Series 14 
CIBING THE DIANETIC CLEAR SPECIAL INTENSIVE (DCST) 
REFS: 							
HCOD 	2 Way 19R 	I 	Dn Clear Series 	4 	
Rev. 	25.3.81 			DIANETIC CLEAR 		
					SPECIAL INTENSIVE 	
aCOB 	2 Yay 798 	II 	·DD Clear Series 5 	
Rev. 	25.3.81 			DIANETIC CLEAR 		
					SPECIAL INTENSIVE 	
					. ASBESSlIIENT LIST 		
HCOD 	1 	Apr 	81 		Dn Clear Series 15 	
					DeSI CASE HISTORIES 	
HCOD 	2 	Apr 	81 		Dn Clear Series 13 . 	
					DeSI RULE MODIFIED 	
BeOB 	31 	Ma.r 	81 		"HEAVY DRUG HISTORY" 	
					DEFINED 		
BeOIl 	19 	Jun 	71 	II 	CIS Series 46 		
					DECLARES 		
HCOB 	11 Oct 	80 		DRUGS AND THEIR EFFECTS 	
					ON AUDITING GAINS 	
'bile the DCSI re~uires qualified auditors who have been brought up to full accuracy in meter reading And other skills. in the final anaiysis .it 1s the thoroughness and the skill ot tbM CIS tbat will ensure there 1s a successful resolution ot the case., 
By "successful resolution" we mean a person, Clear or not, who has bad hie correct ease state bonestly and accurately 0stabl1sbed with no invalidation or evaluation, wbo bas been acknowledged tor the sains he bas made and who is reacb1nK tor bis next step .• 
Achieving th~t result on DeS! pes, one tor one, is & matter of the technical intesr1t, of the CIS as well as his ex&ctitude and expertise. 
PAST DIFFICULTIES WITH DIANETIC. 
CLEAR ATTESTS AND DeSls 
With the 1ssuanc~ ot the BCOB on Dlanetic Clear in 1978 there tollowed & burst of D1a.net1c Clear attests. ID&ny valid, some Dot. The D1anetlc Clear· Special Intensive released 1n 1,979 was designed to provide a standard set of steps for veritying" the state more accurately to prevent any m1s-de·clares 
. ~ - _ •.•. '-~ ·-~~ .•.• {~""lq I'"n"1"'''''t"11""d. 

- ~ - 
Statistics examined. wl"thin the next year reveale4 that wbile Dlanetle Clears had been made in the thousahds. the corresponding number ot those a.ctually moving up the Bridge was not in the ratio that would be expected.. 
At that point a fairly exhaustive study of the situatio~ was undertaken, including pc folders from uumerous areas. 
From this study evidences of Qulckled actions and False Decla.~ turned up_ 
Along with those who had been standardly audited and CISe others had beeD allowed to attest before the state was honestl verified or a full resurgence of the state attained. Ie some cases the Intensive was done over pc (or auditor or CIS) misunderstoodfl'. or scxne parts of it were not done at all. Some wbo had obviously not made it were permitted to attest (by C/~ auditors or Examiners) out at a compulsion or misplaced wish to validate. There were instlUlces ot feeding cognitions to tl: pc, inadvertently or otherwise. 
In brief, where outnesses in past D1anetlc Clear Special Iutensives and Dianetic Clear attests were found. these could be broken down into tbree categories: Ca) CIS troubles, (b) auditor troubles, (e) pc troubles. 
Under CIS troubles we bave had in the past· (1) ~.1suDdel stoods on tbe subject or procedure, and/or (2) in some cases out-ethics on the part ot the CIS. Examples: C/Slng tor the DeSI when not specifically trained or qualified to do so per HCOB '3 May 79, DIANETIC 'CLEAR SPECIAL INTENSIVE CIS AND AUDIT< REQUIREMENTS (wbicb h,as DOW be'en revised), u.d/o,r not meet1nljt all the requirements ot that Ls sue , knowingly going past mlsunderstoods and operating over contusions on the subject ot Clear, routing a person to Declare when there was no proper evidence ot Clear in tbe folder. condonIng or justi!yin~ qu1ckled actions or tbe feeding of cognitions, etc. 
Under auditor troubles we have had the same the part of auditors h~ndllng DeSIa in the past: understoods LIld (~) out-ethics as covered above. inability to read a meter accurately. 
factors on (1) misplus (3) 
Under pc troubles we bave encountered case conditions tb: needed handling OD some Dianetic Clears where the handling wa: 
Dot adequately covered in tbe original DeSI. 
The proper verification and acknowledgement of the State of 'Clear or the indication that the persoD hasn't made it whe he hasnlt. a.re far too important to the indiv.1dual's imrnediat -and future welta.re and the future of Scientology to permit an out tech to &0 undetected and unhandled on th.1s line. 
A sweeping handl1ng of CIS and auditor troubles has now been done with tbe issuance of the ~eeplng Scientoloiy,lorklng Series, whicb re-emphasizes Lad demands standard tecbn1ca appllca~loD and technical integrity. XSW Series 21 througb 25 in particular spell out further the existing tech on the subjects of quickie and False Declare. aDd the handling of tbese once they bave occarrod • 
. - 
The IS. Series alone bas largely reverted the difticulties C/8es and auditors were ba.ving ill mallY areas ot tech, iDcluding the bandllD& ot DCSIs, and are a vital part of CIS '!Inri .l1rl1tor traininl[. 

- -J - 
Additioc,lly. training requiremect6 for C/Ses and audltor! 
OD the delivtiry line ot DCSIs ha v e been toughened up. 
The Di&.cet t c Clear Special Intensive i-tsell ba6 be e a revised to provide a handling tor any of tbe various c o s e conditions that m1iht present tbemselves in the individuals needing 
it. 
It is now a matter of the CIS ensuring totally standard_ 
application of the technology. 
KNOWING THE CASE 
This is done by folder Sttfi'An FES is required. but an FES can bave-' limit ed worka 1 ty depending upon. the technical competence of the FESer. A skimpy. incomplete FES that 
. omits kc~ data is useless. A faulty FES can give a false picture of the case. Even with a competent FESer. the CIS who thinks be can do an adequate job of C/Sing a DCSI on an FES alone and witbout a searching folder study is asking for 
trouble. 
So tor a Dest, tbe CIS uses an FES but he operates oft the raw folder data. He'd better demand that the FES cite the session date and worksheet page numbers of major errors and of all pertinent da.ta. And he'd bet t er dem.a.nd that the FES be sent to him along with the appropria.,te folders, with these session and worksheet pages tabbed in the folders. 
With the above done, be can now dig into the rolders and review tbe raY session data himself to get an accurate picture of and gain familiar! ty wi tb tbl,s individual case. 
~O'iING WHAT TO LOOK FOR 
Wbo.t tbe CIS is going to look for first wben C/Sing for 8. DCSI are those factors which, if unhandled initially. could th~ow the remaining actions of the DeSI oft. 
Needed Repairs 
This would include flubbed Qr unhandled out-Int, out- 
lists or past rougb auditing. If the pc bas had repair ac.tions, bavc these been ineffective "patch up'" repairs or have the repair actions actually bandIed the areas terminatedly for 
the pc? If not. get them dODe correctly. Out-Int, out-lists aDd out-ruds would, of course, be ba.ndled first. Repa1.r of 
past bad auditing would be CjSed ~or next (unless the pc 
	requ1.~e8 drug handling at this point). 	. 
Drugs
What drug handling bas the person had? What drugs bas be taken and tor how long? Does he fall in the category of -baving a "heavy drug bistoryU? (Ref. BCOB 31 Idar 81 "llEAVY DRUG HISTORY" DEFINED) Has be done tbe Puri,t1cation Rundown? Tbe Survival Rundown or Objectives? If be's bad heavy drugs 
. a.nd hasn I t bad t nes.e act ions, a neSI could miss the ma.rk completely as the pc will t~nd to bave his attention stuck, in greater or lesser-degree, 1n.past drug experiences. He could also be contusing p&.st "drug releases" tor actual points of 
•• - - •. ~ .• " ,...~ r'1AA'P" 1 'tf:;p.l"f & 

- 4 - 
On the piloting of the revised DeSI, one pc. app~reDtly f'airly alert otherwise" was actually incapable of sitting still in a tormal auditing sessioD. The pc had had LSD and had done the Purification Rundown but had not done the SRO. He was taken ott the Rundown .nd programmed tor the SRD before doing the DeSI. 
Getting a pc ~ith any kind of heavy drug history througb the Purification Rundown and the Survival Rundown firstUDsticks tbe pc and gets him into present time, in an optimum state to be able to identity and recover any valid wins or reloase states he has achieved in his auditing. (Ref. MeOB 11 Oct 1980 DRUGS AND THEIR EFFECTS ON AUDITING GAINS) 
Even pc~ witb light drug histories may need the benefjt of these two Rundowns before any DeSI handling. For example, one aspect of the case the CIS would look for in tbe pc folders is: Is tbe pc capable 01 answering a subjective question? A pc recently put on the DeSI who had only a light drug bistory and who had done the Purification Rundown was Dot up to answering subjective questions. As a result, the pc was having d.if!iculty on one ot tbe DeSI aud t.t Lng steps. He was being run on Recalls on an item that bad read on the Expanded GF40RE and it was not resolving. The handling was to get the pc. onto the correct gradient-the Survival Rundown for Iull Objectives, which he had Dev~r bad. It may not always be possible to detect this tactoi in a pc, due to insufficient rolder data. until you actually bave the person on the DeSI. But where it 1s spotted in folder study, or wbere the Dest is going nowhere as a result of the pc being in overwhelm (i.e. eas11y diving into the Significance of it all alld incapable 
at answering subjective questions), get him onto the SflD if 
he hasn't had one and get full Objectives completed on him. Even in some eases who have ba.d both Rundowns, repair and/or full completion of Objectives may be needed. 
M1sunderstoods
With any need3d case repair completed, the cIS then C/Ses the pc lor the Scientology e5-1 if required. Has the pc never bad a CS-l? (Or, if so, was it thorough?) Does the folder show evidence of misunderstoods on Scientolocy and auditing terms or procedures? Are there indicn.tioDs of misunderstoods on Clear? It's Up to the CIS to ansure the pc 15 educatQd cnollc;b in the basic actions n.nd termG of aud.i"tiDg to be able to hn.ndlc the steps of the DeB!, aDd he programs tor a ~cientology CS-l to be done accordingly. 
Anyone of the above factors, if prcsp.nt and unresolv~, c an throw a DeSI off and prevent its suc c e s s I'u I c o n c f u.s i on , Anyone 01 them can obscure valid release points or t hc- point of going Clear. A combination ot them. unhandled, ~111 wind a DeS! up in a snarl. So, where it's indicated, gel t~e·pe cleaned up in the beginniog steps of the DeSI. Dtl t d» it realistically-bandle wha.t's wrong, don't c Le a n cl~:-:l:;, don't overshoot and don't undershoot. Know the c a s c Clllel rn.'~. 1 nm 1 t correctly and you'll have a pc in excellent Sb:::';.'l! l\.. Jll.I.:.t:cu with the remaining steps of the DesI. 

- !l - rORMErt ATTESTS 
Wi th a pc who ha s fOl·merly attested to Cl':l J. i 1,( I~! ~~?lt under the act~vity of "knoy,ring: the c a ae " c orne s ";-p'p.,jrq'. un d e r w ha t clrcumstances the former attest was done" RlI.' l','i.:r; able to detect from folder study \:Jhether or not t ho a L t·r ~;t F ":'~J nccompanicd by all the evidences of Clear. 
The CIS in examining this would look for all the points of the End Phenomena being present in the attainment of Clear or a rehab of the point of going Clear. (Ref. HCOB 2 May 79R Rev. 25.3.81 II Dn Clear Series 4 DIANETIC CLEAR SPECIAL INTENSIVE, the section on "End Phenomena.") He's c onc er ne d with the following factors as well, however. 
Does ~e pc still bave his attention on Clear? Is he a.sserting it? Worried about it? Has be expressed any doubts or reservations about his Clear state? Such doubts on the part of the pc may be valid or they may be the result of flubbed actions on the case since the Clear attest, or the 
result ot invalidation by others. 
Mi~handling of cases in auditing. ethics or cramming, trying to handle what doesntt need handling and neglecting what is rea.lly wrong (if anything) can make the person teel bad and think there's something out with his case when there 1sn't. This can lead to pc self-invalidation or invalidation 
ot a valid Clear state. 
The CIS is going to run into: (a) tormer Clear attests wbicb &re definitely and unquestiona.bly valid and which were accompanied by all the evidences ot Clear and full resurgence ot the state and where the pc is now flying, (b) former attests which were unquestionably valid, with all the evidences of Clear, but the pc 1s now in trouble, (c) tormer attests which are questionable, and (d) tormer attests which are false. 
In (a) above, a DeSI would definitely not be needed. In (b) above. the DCSI would not be needed but the pc would need to be given the R-factor that be is Clear, and then prcgramrned to get cleaned up on any flubbed actions which have messed 
him up since. The CIS should not overlook toe fact that sucb a case could have accumulated bypassed charge on Dianetic auditing that was received atter the point of going Clear but before a Clear attest was actually done. (The ref. !or cases (a) and (b) is HCOB 2 Apr 81, CIS Series 111, Dn Clear Series 13, DeSI RULE MODIFIED) 
In (c) above, this would be resolved by do int;O all needed steps of the DCSI. In Cd) above, a false former attest would not usually be finally determined until Step IV of the DeSl (Rehabbing of Former Releases) had been done. In some cases' ·it may become obvious earlier. 
DEMAND ACCURATE METERI NG 
On the DeSI, flubless metering is required. Th~ ~uditor must be able to do flawless assessments in order to accurately find t he areas of bypassed charge to be handled. He must: be able to Date/Locate with precision. A CIS can't get Lhe job done using audlto~s who are !lubby on:the1r me~erin~. Thus, be must demand his DesI audLt or s be skill,ed at metering, and he must be able to detect missed reads or reads taken up un- 
	_J~ __ 	' __ ...I --." •.. ,,'" " •• '"'~ .•••....•.••• I"'1"\"''''Pf''tPC't fast whE'!J1 this does 

HC08 !.4.8~ 	- 6 - 
Charged areas missed on Assessment A of the DeS! (Expanded GF40 assessment) or charged areas missed on the ~ubject ot Clear in Assessment B will result in a flubbed DeSI. 
REHABS
Some pes may feel the rehab of former releases .slf.;p ia unnecessary tor them and where this validly is the case the step can be waived. But the CIS should not overlook the importance of t.bis step. part ic.ularly the reba.bbing ot releases in life on fairly new pes, as these ''.In life releases" can be one of the reasons a pc migbt consider be went Clear 1n life. prior to aud1ting. Thus, these and other release points should be handled before attempting any rebab of Clear; so there is 
no confusion between sucb releases and the state of Clear itself. 
DATE/LOCATE
All the earlier steps of the DeSI are designed to prepare the ·pc who bas gone Clear, tor tbe Date/Locate step-wbere the exact point ot his going Clear is finally established. 
With all the case outnesses straightened out· and bandIed. with any inval or eval or other bypassed charge cleared olf the case, and any' contusions between release states and the state of Clear tully re,Bolved. tbe Date/Locate can then be taken swiftly and accurately to its conclusion. 
The CIS HUST have ascertained from all earlier 10lder da,ta tb •. t tbe pe bas actually gone Clear before Da.te/Locate is undertaken. Tbe meter phenomena will Dot necessarily be present before the Date/Locate is done. but tbe pc. must bave voiced the evidences of Clear at some point and the CjS must be trained to recognize such evidences when they are given. Otherwise, if the pc is not Clear there 1s no point when be weot Clear to be Date/Located. 
Tbis is NOT a step on wbich the state of Clear is determined. This would bave to bave been establisbed. in the previous steps of the Intensive. It 1s the step on which the point of the pc actually baving gone Clear is precisely Datel Located 1n order to bring about full resurgence. 
C/SING FOR THE PC WHO HASN'T HADE CLEAR 
The CIS must give particular attention to the handling of the case of a pc wbo 1s found mot to have attained Clear. The handling. steps for this are clearly outlined in D1~netic Clear Series. 4 (DIANETIC CLEAR SPECIAL INTENSIVE). 
In the majority of cases where the pc was found Dot to be Clear and then given the R-factor on this. the correct indication did Dot result in serious upset on tb~ pels part. There may be Bome loss to be handled, but a correct indIcation of th·e case state will Dot cause aD actual worsen1.ng at the pc's casso 

- 7 - 
Where the pc c~ves in heavily as result of this indication it requires a very thorough re-study ot the folder 
	, 	. . 
and a review of all the actions taken on the DCSl~· Invali- 
dation of the state of Clear wbere it genuinely exists could cause such a cave-in. The CIS must determine accurately whether or not this is the case. There may be bypassed charge that was Dot picked up and bandIed during the DCSI due to an auditor's faulty metering, or other unhandled outnesses that could have submerged a valid Clear state • 
• Note also, tb&t the pc getting into ethics trouble during or immediately alter auditing usually indicates bypassed cbarge or out tech on tbe C8.5e. 
Therefore where the pc wbo appears not to have made it goes into heav'f and aer-Lous upset at this indication, or gets into ethics trouble, a very full review 01 the DeSI steps must be done, and any outnesses or omissions corrected, at which point the whole situation will resolve. 
The decision regarding whether a pc should be declared or not, 1s a vital CIS action. (Ret. HCOB 19 Jun 71 II CIS Series 46 DECLARES) 
ETHICS AND TECHNICAL INTEGRITY 
With all the tech that no~ exists for the handling of DiaDet1c Clear. there is no reason whatsoever for a mis-declare or a false declare of the state of Clear. 
A CIS who maintains a high level of ethics and technical i.ntegrlty, who does not justify or permit quickie actions, who stamps out any Q and A or the feeding ot cognitions to a pc. who handles cases with no invalidation or evaluation, who gets all th.e needed actions of the DeSI done and done standardlYJ and wbo demands tbe same higb level at ethics and technical integrity trom his aUditors, will be able to produce shining results with this technology. 
With the DeSI the CIS is, in the tinal analysis, establishing TRUTH and belping the pc to do the same. 
Witb your own ethics and tecbnical intp.grity well in, establishing truth for the pc in the matter 01 Clear becomes & straightfo~ward action. 
L. RON HUBBARD FOUNDER 
BDCSC:LRH:RTCU:bk Copyright © 1981 
by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESE,RVED 
As assisted by Researcb nnd Technical Compilations Unit 
Approved & Accepted by the 
BOARD OF D I RECTORS . or the 
CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY 01 CALIFORNIA