    WARNER & JACKSON
    639 South Spring Street
    Los Angeles 14, California
    Tucker 9171
    Attorneys for Plaintiff

    [Stamped: FILED Apr 23 1951, Harold Cecily, County Clerk]

              IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
                    IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

    SARA NORTHRUP HUBBARD,                    )
                                              )
    Plaintiff,                                )
                                              )
    vs.                                       )
                                              )
    L. RON HUBBARD, also known as             )
    LAFAYETTE RONALD HUBBARD; Los             )
    Angeles Department HUBBARD DIANETIC       )    No. D
    RESEARCH FOUNDATION, a partnership;       )    COMPLAINT FOR DIVORCE
    THE HUBBARD DIANETIC RESEARCH             )
    FOUNDATION OF CALIFORNIA, INC., a         )
    California corporation; FRANK B.          )
    DESSLER; RICHARD B. DE MILLE;             )
    VINCE MC GONIGEL; WESTWOOD NURSES         )
    REGISTRY AGENCY; BEKINS VAN AND           )
    STORAGE CO.; BANK OF AMERICA NATIONAL     )
    TRUST & SAVINGS ASSOCIATION; SECURITY     )
    FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LOS ANGELES;       )
    DOE ONE, DOE TWO, DOE THREE, DOE FOUR,    )
    DOE FIVE, DOE SIX, DOE SEVEN, DOE         )
    EIGHT, DOE NINE and DOE TEN,              )
                                              )
                 Defendants.                  )
    ------------------------------------------)

    [Stamped: D414408]

    	COMES NOW the plaintiff and for cause of action against
    defendants alleges and says:

                                     I

    	That in the early part of 1946, plaintiff, then age 21
    and unmarried, resided with her family in Pasadena, and a
    the University of Southern California, that at said time,
    defendant L. Ron Hubbard, hereinafter referred to as "Hubbard",
    was a married man, age 35, he being then married to Margaret Grubb

                                   - 1 -
    Hubbard of Bremerton, Washington, they having two children; that
    said Hubbard represented to plaintiff that he was single and un-
    married, and plaintiff relying upon said representation, and hav-
    ing fallen in love, entered into a marriage ceremony with said
    Hubbard on the 10th day of August, 1946, at Chestertown, Maryland
    that said Hubbard thereafter secured a divorce from said Margaret
    Grubb Hubbard on or about the 24th day of December, 1947, at
    Port Orchard, Washington; that plaintiff and said Hubbard ever
    since the said 10th day of August, 1946, have lived together as
    husband and wife, and on the 8th day of March, 1950, had a child
    born to them, Alexis Valorie [sic] Hubbard, at Point Pleasant, New
    Jersey; that the parties have always considered themselves
    husband and wife in their travels about the nation; that at all
    times herein mentioned, said Hubbard has represented to plaintiff
    that they were legally married, and plaintiff relied upon such
    representations; that by reason thereof, plaintiff alleges herein.
    that plaintiff and said Hubbard are husband and wife; that in
    the event it should be held that the parties are not legally
    married, plaintiff will seek the damages prayed for herein for
    fraud and deceit on the part of said Hubbard, in entrapping
    plaintiff into the matrimonial predicament that she now finds
    herself in.

                                   II

    	That plaintiff was born in Pasadena, California on the
    8th day of April, 1925, and grew up and was educated in the State
    of California; that plaintiff does now and always has considered
    California to be her home state, and plaintiff and said Hubbard
    have maintained their residence in California from time to time
    since said marriage in between their travels about the United
    States and at all times have had their furniture in the State of
    California, and have considered California to be their permanent
    residence; that by reason thereof, plaintiff is now and for more

                                 - 2 -
    than one year immediately preceding the commencement of this
    action, has been a resident of the State of California; that
    plaintiff has been a resident of the County of Los Angeles for
    more than three months, immediately preceding the commencement
    of this action.

                                  III

    	Statistical facts required by section 426a of the Civil
    Code of Procedure are:

    (1) Place of marriage; Chestertown, Maryland;

    (2) Date of marriage; On the 10th day of August
    1946;

    (3) Date of separation; On or about the 24th day of
    February 1951;

    (4) Time elapsing between the date of marriage and
    the date of separation; Approximately four years, six months
    and twelve days; and

    (5) There is one child of the marriage; Alexis
    Valorie Hubbard, age 13 months.

                                   IV

    	That there is community property of the plaintiff and
    said Hubbard consisting of a community interest in the Hubbard
    Dianetic Research Foundation, with its headquarters in Elizabeth.
    New Jersey, and which operates a school and clinic in Chicago,
    Illinois, New York City, Los Angeles, Honolulu, Wichita, Kansas,
    and elsewhere; that said Hubbard and said foundation did over
    one million dollars in business during the year 1950, and owns
    valuable community property and assets; that said foundation
    operates in the State of California, under the name of "The
    Hubbard Dianetic Research Foundation of California, Inc., a
    California corporation", defendant herein; that said corporation.
    is the alter ego of said Hubbard.

                                 - 3 -
    	That said separation took place by reason of the extreme
    cruelty practiced upon the plaintiff by the said Hubbard, which
    has caused the plaintiff great mental anguish and physical suffer-
    ing during the past five years of the married life of the parties,
    consisting in part as follows;

    	(a) That during the marriage up until the month of
    October, 1950, said Hubbard, an "older man" completely dominated
    the youthful plaintiff, both physically, mentally and emotionally
    and taking advantage of her trusting love and desire for a success-
    ful marriage, repeatedly subjected plaintiff to systematic torture,
    including loss of sleep, beatings, and strangulations and scientific
    torture experiments, including the following:

    	(b) That in the latter part of September, 1950, said
    Hubbard told plaintiff at the Chateau Marmont Apartments in
    Hollywood, that "I do not want to be an American husband for I
    can buy my friends whenever I want them", and he further said
    that he, Hubbard, did not want to be married, yet divorce was
    impossible, for a divorce would hurt his reputation, and that
    she, plaintiff, should kill herself if she really loved him.

    	(c) That at said time and place, said Hubbard systemati-
    cally prevented plaintiff from sleeping continuously for a period
    of over four days, and then in her agony, furnished her with a
    supply of sleeping pills, all resulting in a nearness to the
    shadow of death. That the foregoing was a frequent occurence [sic]
    during the married life of the parties.

            (d) That at said time and place, plaintiff became numb
    and lost consciousness, and was thereafter taken by said Hubbard to
    the Hollywood Leland Hospital, where she was kept under a vigilant
    guard from friend and family under an assumed name, for five
    days.

            (e) That shortly following Christmas, 1950, said Hubbard

                                 - 4 -
    violently strangled plaintiff and sadistically ruptured the
    eustachian tube of her left ear, resulting in the impairment of
    her hearing. That such strangulation of plaintiff was a frequent
    practice on the part of said Hubbard.

    	(f) That in January, 1951, at Palm Springs, while
    plaintiff was getting out of an automobile operated by said Hubbard
    he intentionally started the said car in gear, thus propelling
    plaintiff to the pavement resulting in serious personal injury.

    	(g) That plaintiff and her medical advisors, following
    the foregoing incidents, concluded that said Hubbard was hopelessly
    insane, and crazy, and that there was no present hope for said
    Hubbard, or any reason for her to indure [sic] further; that competent
    medical advisors recommended that said Hubbard be committed to
    a private sanitarium for psychiatric observation and treatment
    of a mental ailment known as paranoid schizophrenia; that
    plaintiff, on the 23rd day of February, 1951, caused the national
    executive officer of the Hubbard Dianetic Research Foundation at
    Elizabeth, New Jersey, to be advised of said preliminary diagnosis
    and urgent need for treatment; that said national officer immedi-
    ately advised said Hubbard of said diagnosis.

    	(h) That at 11;00 o'clock P.M., on said 23rd day of
    February, 1951, said Hubbard, together with defendant Frank B.
    Dessler, head of the Los Angeles Dianetic Foundation, abducted the
    infant child of the parties, Alexis from her crib, and deposited
    said infant in West Los Angeles with defendant Vince Mc Gonigle
    under the assumed name of Anne Marie Olson, and concealed said
    infant from plaintiff until this day. That this was admitted by
    said Dessler in the habeas corpus proceedings filed on the 10th
    day of April, 1951 entitled In re Alexis Valorie Hubbard, Los
    Angeles Superior Court Number H.C. 35879.

    	(i) That said Hubbard, Dessler and defendant Richard B.
    De Mille, having secreted said infant child, feloniously dragged

                                 - 5 -
    plaintiff out of her bed attired only in her night gown, it then being
    1;00 o'clock A.M., of the morning of the 24th day of February, 1951,
    and by the use of threats, strangulation, torture, and false promises
    to return her child to her, carried and kidnapped plaintiff to Yuma,
    Arizona, all as is detailed at length in the habeas corpus
    proceeding above mentioned.

    	(j) That plaintiff has ever since sought the
    whereabouts of her infant child, and has consulted attorneys, police,
    sheriffs, Federal Bureau Of Investigation agents, and courts, and has
    brought said habeas corpus proceedings; that said Hubbard and his
    attorneys refuse any information as to the whereabouts of her infant
    child, unless she goes back to live with said Hubbard, an alternative
    that means certain continued torture and possible death, a predicament
    no good woman, wife and mother should have to face.

    	(k) That through all her trials and tribulations, and up
    until the month of February, 1951, plaintiff bore her suffering and
    sorrows in silence and even now would not bare the truth to the
    world, except for the compelling advice of her attorney, Caryl
    Warner, that she tell the truth for the truth will make her free, and
    the truth alone, will bring back her baby, if alive.

    	(l) That by reason of the foregoing crazy misconduct
    of said Hubbard, plaintiff is in hourly fear of both the life of
    herself and of her infant daughter, who she has not seen for two
    months.

    	That all of said acts on the part of said Hubbard towards
    the plaintiff have been without cause or justification, and without
    the consent of the plaintiff, and have caused her great mental anguish
    and horrible physical suffering.

                                  VI

    	That the custody of said infant child Alexis should be
    awarded to plaintiff, without reservation or condition; that the Court
    should order and compel said Hubbard to submit to legitimate

                                 - 6 -
    psychiatric examination in the interests of tile welfare and safety
    of said minor child, who is secreted by Hubbard someplace in North
    America.

                                  VII

    	That said Hubbard is an able-bodied man, and is well able
    to support and provide for plaintiff and their child; that by
    reason thereof, said Hubbard should be ordered to pay to plaintiff
    reasonable support for plaintiff and said infant child during the
    pendency of this action, and thereafter pay permanent alimony and
    child support; that in addition thereto, said Hubbard should be
    ordered to pay a reasonable sum as and for attorney's fees and
    costs of suit; that a lien should be impressed upon the real
    property hereinafter described to secure payment of the sums allow-
    ed herein.

                                  VIII

    	That said Hubbard has harrassed [sic], injured and kidnapped
    plaintiff as alleged herein, and has threatened to kill plaintiff;
    that plaintiff is informed and believes, and upon such information
    and belief alleges that said Hubbard, unless restrained from so
    doing, will carry out his said threats, and will again injure and
    molest plaintiff; that by reason thereof, the Court should restrain
    said Hubbard from molesting or injuring plaintiff during the pendency
    of this hearing of this cause, and upon the trial of this action,
    the Court should permanently enjoin said Hubbard from committing any
    of said acts in regard to plaintiff.

                                  IX

    	That said Hubbard departed from the State of California
    on the 24th day of February, 1951, and ever since has remained out-
    side of California, for the purpose of evading the process of the
    Court, and for the purpose of attempting to deprive plaintiff of
    her marital rights herein; that said absence from the State on the
    part of said Hubbard was and is for the purpose of resisting

                                 - 7 -
    plaintiff's efforts to enforce her said rights against said defendant
    for support and maintenance for herself and her child and to obtain an
    equitable division of the community property of the parties; that said
    Hubbard has repeatedly threatened that he would stay out of
    California so as to make it impossible for her to get any money or
    support from him and to prevent her from sharing in the community
    property of the parties, and said Hubbard has stated that he would
    do everything in his power to deprive plaintiff. of all of her said
    marital rights; that plaintiff is informed and believes, and upon
    such information and belief, alleges that pursuant to said threats,
    said Hubbard has concealed various community assets, and has placed
    said assets in the name of Hubbard Dianetics Research Foundation, and
    in the names of the other defendants named herein, and in the names of
    other persons unknown to the plaintiff that said Hubbard will continue
    to further hide and conceal said community property assets from
    plaintiff unless prevented from doing so by the appointment of a
    receiver herein; that by reason of the said acts of said Hubbard,
    plaintiff has been compelled to exhaust her own personal estates and
    to draw upon her family for support; that by reason thereof, plaintiff
    is without adequate funds for her own support or the support of her
    child, or to prosecute this action; that all of the acts heretofore
    set forth on the part of said Hubbard were perpetrated intentionally
    and willfully and for the express purpose of defrauding plaintiff of
    her said marital rights, and to unjustly and fraudulently deprive
    plaintiff of any and all of her rights whatsoever, and to render her
    helpless and subject to his complete and arbitrary will and
    domination.

                                   X

    	That said receiver should be empowered to take over,
    operate, and sell the defendant Hubbard Dianetic Research Foundation
    of California, Inc., property at 2300 South Hoover Street, Los

                                 - 8 -
    Angeles, California, and more particularly described as;
              Lot 6 of Belgravia Tract, in the City of
              Los Angeles, County of Los Angeles, State
              of California, 8S per map in Book 23,
              Page 54 of Miscellaneous Records of said
              County, and a portion of Lot 3, Block 22,
              of Hancock's Survey in said City and
              County of Los Angeles, as per map recorded
              in Book 2, page 108 of Miscellaneous
              Records of said county;
    that said receiver should be allowed to pay to plaintiff such sums
    as the Court may allow for the support of plaintiff and the minor
    child, and for her attorney's fees and costs incurred herein; that
    plaintiff has no plain, speedy or adequate remedy at law other
    then the appointment Of a receiver, for the reasons set forth
    herein.

                                   XI

    	That the true names or capacities, whether individual
    corporate, associate or otherwise, of defendants Doe One through
    Doe Tens inclusive, are unknown to plaintiffs who there ore sues
    said defendants by such fictitious names, and will as, leave to
    amend this complaint to show their true names and capacities when
    same have been ascertained.

                  AND FOR A SECOND, SEPARATE AND FURTHER
               CAUSE OF ACTION, plaintiff alleges and says;

                                   I

    	Plaintiff refers to Paragraphs I, II, III, IV, V, VI,
    and VII of her First Cause of Action and by reference makes them a
    part hereof.

                                   II

    That plaintiff believes herself to be the lawfully
    wedded wife of said defendant L. Ron Hubbard, in that she entered

                                 - 9 -
    into said marriage in good faith, all as is alleged herein; that in
    the event the Court should find that she is not legally married to
    said defendant, plaintiff in such an event alleges that said
    marriage should be annuled [sic], and that she be awarded damages as
    hereinafter set forth; that said defendant wilfully [sic] and
    intentionally caused plaintiff to believe that she was his lawfully
    wedded wife, and if she in fact is not, said Hubbard in such an
    event should be ordered to pay the damages prayed for herein.

                                  III

    	That plaintiff, believing that she was the lawfully wedded
    wife of said Hubbard, over a period of five years, devoted her life to
    said Hubbard, and served as wife, mother, housekeeper, author's
    assistant, and pursuant thereto, washed dishes, cleared floors,
    scrubbed the floors and walls, cooked and served meals for said
    Hubbard, bore him a child, [loaned him over $20,000 - crossed out], and
    otherwise subjected herself to the course of cruelty alleged
    herein; that by reason thereof, the chances of plaintiff for
    happiness in life, and chances for a normal marriage have been
    diminished, and plaintiff has been prevented from following a
    profession of her choice, and has been so deprived of the "golden
    years of a woman's life", and by reason thereof, she has been
    damaged in the sum of $100,000.00 a year, making a total of
    $500,000.00 in all, if in fact it be found that she is not the
    lawfully wedded wife of said Hubbard, and has been subjected to
    the shame of a bigamous marriage.

                                  IV

    That in the event it be found that plaintiff is not the
    lawfully wedded wife of said Hubbard, plaintiff should be accorded
    the right of a putative wife, and by reason thereof, should be
    allowed the same community property rights and interests in and
    to the property acquired by the plaintiff and the said Hubbard,
    following said ceremonial marriage on the 10th day of August,

                                 - 10 -
    1946, all as is prayed for herein.

    	WHEREFORE, plaintiff prays judgment against defendant,
    L. Ron Hubbard, as follows;

    	(1) For a Judgment of divorce from said defendant,
    that the bonds of matrimony heretofore and now existing between
    said parties be dissolved;

    	(2) That the custody of the minor child of the
    marriage, Alexis Valorie Hubbard, be awarded to plaintiff;

    	(3) That defendant L. Ron Hubbard be ordered to pay
    to plaintiff reasonable alimony and support, and further
    provide reasonable support and maintenance for the minor child
    of the said marriage, Alexis Valorie Hubbard;

    	(4) That the community property of the parties hereto be
    equitably apportioned, and the right, title and claim of interest
    of defendants herein other than said defendant Hubbard, be
    determined and adjudicated.

    	(5) That a lien be impressed upon the real property of
    said defendant Hubbard, to secure the payment of the sums of the
    alimony and support allowed herein;

    	(6) That reasonable attorney's fees and costs of suit
    be awarded plaintiff and her counsel, and that said defendant be
    ordered to pay the same.

    	(7) That in the event it be held that plaintiff is
    not a resident of the State of California, for the prescribed
    period, in such an event plaintiff prays that a decree of
    separate maintenance be entered herein, in lieu of a divorce;

    	(8) That the Court appoint a receiver herein with
    customary powers to take over, manage, operate, and sell the
    business and properties of the community estate of the parties
    including the real property described in the complaint, said
    property to be held by said receiver subject to the order and
    direction of the Court, and that all defendants herein be ordered

                                  - 11 -
    and directed to pay to said receiver, any community funds and
    deliver any community property they have in their possession,
    and that said receiver to be appointed ex parte, and that upon
    notice, said appointment of said receiver be confirmed and made
    permanent;

    	(9) That said defendant Hubbard be restrained from
    injuring, molesting, or harming plaintiff, and be restrained from
    interfering with the custody of the minor child, and that upon
    the trial of the cause, said restraining order be made permanent;

    	(10) That said Hubbard be restrained from concealing,
    dissipating, transfering [sic], or hiding any of the community property
    assets or property of the parties hereto; and

            (11) That if said marriage be held bigamous, that it be
    annuled;

    	(12) That plaintiff be awarded damages in the sum of
    $500,000, if said marriage be found to be invalid;

    	(13) That said Hubbard be ordered to submit to a
    psychatric [sic] examination as a protection to said infant child; and

    	(14) That plaintiff be awarded any such other and
    further relief as is meet and proper.

                                 WARNER & JACKSON

                                     [signed: Caryl Warner]
                                 By: ________________
                                       Caryl Warner
                                 Attorneys for Plaintiff

                                  - 12 -
    STATE OF CALIFORNIA      )
    County of Los Angeles    ) ss.

    	SARA NORTHRUP HUBBARD being by me first duly sworn,
    deposes and says: that she is the plaintiff in the above
    entitled action; that she has read the foregoing Complaint
    for Divorce and knows the contents thereof, and that the same
    is true of her own knowledge, except as to the matters which are
    therein stated upon her information or belief, and as to those
    matters she believes it to be true.

                                        [signed: Sara Northrup Hubbard]
                                        _____________________
                                        Sara Northrup Hubbard

    Subscribed and sworn before me
    this 23rd day of April, 1951.

    [signed: B. R. Trout]
    ______________________________

    Notary Public in and for said	              (SEAL)
    County of Los Angeles, State of
    California

                                  - 13 -