LRH lecture 4 March 1952 HCL-3 The Axioms and How They Apply to Auditing

“As far as handling these facsimiles is concerned, the individual who is mostly MEST force, low Tone Scale, who is very badly mixed up with the physical universe, is being beaten back by the physical universe, is losing, his facsimiles all demonstrate failure and defeat to him - this individual contains, apparently, more of the manifestations of chaos.

So that as you go down the Tone Scale the individual is more and more mixed up, his facsimiles seem to be more and more scrambled. All you'd have to do is bring him up the Tone Scale and he would unscramble his facsimiles. Quite important for you to realize that: that you can bring him up the Tone Scale and his track straightens out and his facsimiles straighten out and everything straightens out.”

“Now, so you see, there are various ways of approaching this problem: One would be through better reasoning. Another one would be through a better concept - that is, a new idea. Another one would be through loss of aberrative incidents. And actually, when you don't get all three you aren't getting results.

If you take out an aberrative incident and it immediately produces a better concept of existence and produces at the same time better reasoning capabilities, then you've won. But if you take the incident out without producing the other two, you've not won. And you could theoretically keep processing a person ad infinitum on the wrong incidents and the wrong things and so forth, and his computational level will stay the same and his concept of existence will stay the same. Well, that means you're losing ground and you're just wasting time. You see how this would be?

So there's your test - an interesting, simple test to know. Is this person thinking better? Has his concept of existence changed?”

 

Summary of Important Concepts

Improving reason is another way of saying improving ethics. Ethics is reason. Thus part of auditor beingness is the intention to improve ethics. That includes the auditor having the intention to improve his own ethics, as well as improving the ethics level of the BTs and clusters he is auditing.

LRH Book Science of Survival –

Book I Chapter 6

“Theta itself could be called reason; entheta could be called unreason.”

So, theta is reason and ethics is reason. Entheta is unreason.

In other words, theta is ethics and entheta is out ethics.

Theta = reason = ethics

Entheta = unreason = out ethics

The task of the auditor is to raise the preclear on the tone scale by converting entheta back to theta. In other words, he raises the preclear on the tone scale by converting out ethics back into ethics.

If the Excalibur solo auditor is not getting the Beings in the composite case to be more ethical, then he is not getting them to rise on the tone scale by converting entheta back to theta.

And, if the Excalibur solo auditor is not getting himself to be more ethical, then he is not causing himself to rise on the tone scale by converting entheta back to theta.

LRH Book Science of Survival –

Book II Chapter 1

“The tone scale is actually a chart of the ratio of free theta and entheta in the individual.”

Book I Chapter 1

“An auditor is not trying to cure anything, he is simply raising tone. The whole intent of processing is to raise the individual from lower to higher strata on this scale. To raise a person on this tone scale it is only necessary to recover or convert theta from entheta.”

So, if ethics are not going in, then the entire purpose of auditing is undermined.

And right there you have the reason for no OTs.

Failure to get in ethics results in failure to convert entheta back to theta and thus you get no rise on the tone scale, thus you get no OTs.