Subject: Re: For Sarah
From: "Robert \"bob\" Hummels" <[email-masked]>
Date: 7 Nov 1999 15:16:09 -0500
Newsgroups: alt.clearing.technology

OK Phil....

Hubbard was into taking all he could get
from Parsons.  If you actually read those
wonderful books you will find LRH took everything
from Parsons and left him in ruin.... right?

Now to this Satan thing....satan was a fallen angel right?
Angels come from heaven, and LRH did not profess to 
believe in heave either....so just HTF can he base
Scientology on the worship of an angel who was
thrown out of a place in someone's imagination 
that never existed?  

LRH used what he learned in his take over of Parson's
material goods just as much as any other single source
in his background to build Scientology.

And this again is partly a mistake.  LRH did not build
Scientology alone. A  "hell" :) of a lot of players
were there building right along side him. 

Your obsession with turning Xtians against LRH is REALLY
getting old.  Just tell them what he though about Christ
and leave all the Satanic worship crap in your own mind
where it originated...you are source Phil....get it?

ARC,
b0b