Chapter Five:
The Solo Levels
MATERIALS
In this text I'm generally using the term "Solo Levels" to replace the old "OT levels".
Occasionally, though, I'm going to say "OT 1-3" when I mean the actual written materials. Yet when I'm referring to the auditing actions suggested by me, I'll say "Solo Levels".
The auditing actions I'm going to suggest may not coincide with what's done elsewhere, by other C/Ses. My background on this is first St.Hill UK and then Bill Robertson.
The term "OT level" is actually quite well-chosen in that "OT" refers to the telepathic aspect of solo auditing, to actions one does as a thetan and not by means of a body.
Since one becomes increasingly aware of oneself operating as a thetan (both in and out of session) as one moves up these levels, they are rightfully called OT levels. But in order to emphasize that the procedures described in this text are my personal way of going about it and don't purport to follow anyone's idea of "standard tech", and since the exaggerated claims by the Church of Scientology's propaganda machine have distorted the word OT beyond recognition, I personally prefer the rather modest term Solo Level.
Each of the Solo Levels 1 to 3 consist of an instruction and an auditing action. The instruction refers to the bank segments to be audited and how to audit them. They should be studied in the handwriting of Ron Hubbard (at least those of OT 1 and 3. I have never seen the C.C. and OT 2 in Ron's own hand).
This is the traditional way of studying OT 1-3 so as to guarantee the authenticity of the materials.
Unfortunately these materials are not on sale in your local bookstore. But there are ways of getting them. (The handwritten materials of OT 3 were quoted in their entirity in the "Pied Pipers", LK3/ch. 3.)
The steps above Solo 3 don't require any materials beyond what's covered in this book.
A Historical Review
Various "bridges" have evolved inside and outside the Church of Scientology. The first bridge (1950) was auditing Dianetics until you had a Clear. Then followed Mest Clear, Theta Clear, Cleared Theta Clear. Then Grade I to VII, with Grades I to IV being the usual, Grade V being Power, Grade VI being R6EW and Grade VII the Clearing Course Materials. Grade VII was Clear. This bridge was extended in 1968 to include OT I to III. A few years later it was extended to include OT IV to VII. These levels, the so-called "old" OT levels, were mainly OT drills. You were meant to take on the viewpoints of people and animals, getting the feel of them and getting them to follow your intentions. These "old" OT levels presupposed that the auditee was through with his OT III to the point of not a single BT left. They didn't work because nobody was really through with OT III to the required extent at the time. So in 1978 the top end of the bridge was changed, to be replaced by "new" OT IV to VII, namely NOTs ("New Era Dianetics for OTs"). NOTs does not (as the promo suggests) make one "Cause over Life", neither does it really handle OT III to its end. Again later the Church of Scn bridge was extended up to OT VIII, something one has to do on the Sea Org's ocean cruiser. OT VIII yet again does not take one through to the end phenomenon of OT III but restricts itself to some OT drills based on objectives and certain L&N processes designed to drill holes into one's case.
Concurrently, after the independent scene separated out from the Church of Scn in 1982, various other attempts were made outside the Church to build a better bridge. One was Captain Bill Robertson's Bridge to "caselessness" which went up through the usual OT levels I to III, then jumped a gap to Excalibur as OT 8, then from OT 9 to OT 16, and finally to OT 48. Excalibur does handle OT III to its end. It was Robertson's answer to NOTs. He tried to handle what was left unhandled after Excalibur by forever envisioning and adding new OT levels, in the attempt to eventually attain the promised "caselessness". One problem with Robertson's bridge was that he never tested his OT levels out (not even himself) before handing them over to the public. He simply envisioned them. Robertson died in 1991.
Parallel to that, Irene Mumford developed "Dianesis", essentially a GPM process which is done solo after attaining Clear. As much as I know, Dianasis has no definite end phenomenon like "full OT" or "case completion. It seems that one can go on and on with it. Irene Mumford died in 1994 (I believe).
Again parallel to that, "Metapsychology" was formed. ("Meta" means "one level above".) David Mayo had run his AACs (Advanced Ability Centers), delivering the Church bridge from Clear through OT 1-3 to NOTs, until he was sued by the Church and had to close down. He got together with Frank Garbode, a psychiatrist and old-time scientologist. Together they founded "Metapsychology" which basically consists of lower level Hubbard-materials. These were re-written to get around the copyright problem and be able to approach the general public without the scientology stigma. To my knowledge Metapsychology doesn't go into whole track GPMs and implants at all.
Yet again parallel to that (a lot happened between 1982 and 1985!) Harry Palmer got together with a number of disenchanted Class VIII and XII auditors and founded "Avatar". It includes a three-step personal evolvement based on Hubbard's early objective and creative processes. An avatar, in Hindu mythology, is an enlightened being from a more subtle realm of existence who comes down here endowed with miraculous powers to help us Earthlings on. He is not just a re-incarnated person. I fail to understand why Harry Palmer chose this name for his movement except that perhaps his processes reflect the high-level awareness of an avatar as they imply the concept of "why don't you simply as-is it just like that?"
Lastly there is the bridge suggested by me and described in this book. It is based on Hubbard's Clear-to-OT-III bridge and features Robertson's Excalibur as its central component. The processes above Excalibur were researched between 1989 and 1995 by me and the solo-auditors assisting me. At the time of the writing of this book (1996) they can be considered well-tested.
(For a further discussion of the subject of "bridge building", see LK2, the chapter on Clear near the end of the book, and LK3/ch.6.)
PREREQUISITES
Don't expect people to handle on the Solo Levels what ought to have been handled on their Life Repair. The Solo Levels do not replace handling by ordinary means (basic tools) the auditee's attention on his life and his body.
As long as the auditee can specify an area of concern and as long as that area has charge on it, it can be handled by ordinary means - be it duo or solo.
Don't ever put anyone on Solo 1-3 as a life remedy. "Your case is so special, there surely is some upper level charge involved". Oh no! His life is remedied before Clear and during Clear on the Solo Practicals. Certainly, upper level charge quite definitely and severely monitors people's lives, yet the point is: they won't be successful on the rather subtle upper level stuff as long as their attention is fixated on rather gross, commonplace items.
The grossness of these commonplace items subdues the subtle commlines to the world of BTs, entities in general, disincarnate thetans, etc.
Very frustrating for a solo auditor to have done Solo 1-3 with no results. Don't do it! Very bad PR.
Do a good job from the bottom upwards. It may take years. But they are years well invested. Quickie solutions never made anyone happy.
When you hit problems on a certain level, there are three possible explanations: one, not the right action at this point in time. The person's interest is elsewhere. Two, not properly introduced to the peculiarities of the level he is on. Three, general auditing skills are lacking.
It's always one of those three.
Clears And OTs As Newcomers
When "old" Clears and OTs come on lines I treat them like any newcomer. I do a full interview (as per LK2), I ask them at what point they attested Clear, how it felt running OT3, how their perceptions were, how skilled they are as auditors. I have them do demos of auditing techniques with me as a dummy auditee.
After all, if I am to take responsibility for them - in particular on a long- distance comm line - I must know who I am dealing with!
Some "Clears" were told to attest over a private cup of coffee and without a single hour of auditing, by "C/Ses" who "just knew the guy is a Clear"!
Some people attested to OT 3 without ever having contacted a single BT or Cluster!
So I do the usual interview analysis and work out a program and then I sit them down and audit them as I would audit anyone else. And when they are indeed up to the level they attested to they will demonstrate it by handling the charge that showed in the interview in the fashion typical for that level.
Someone on Solo 3 may certainly have charge on various aspects of life, but when audited on it he will immediately spot entities and assign correct ownership of charge. And then of course he should continue solo.
On the other hand, people who can't do that get audited like anyone else. This handles the personal charge that should have been handled a lot earlier already. After that they may have to do their Solo 3 or Excalibur a second time all over again. That did actually happen! It's as if the first time through they hadn't really been there. It was an automaticity auditing the case, not a thetan. Doesn't work.
GENERAL DESCRIPTION
Solo 1 - 3 deal specifically with the Earth case, the sort of case that's typical for down here. Because it is planet Earth that took the brunt of Incident II, 75 million years ago. So anyone walking about on this planet is liable to get spiritually contaminated without his knowing, something that wouldn't happen to him quite to that extent on any of the 76 other planets involved.
When you audit people originating from places like Aldebaran, Sirius or Arcturus you get an idea of what life on planet Earth might have been like before it got hit, and what it will be like once it's been restored to normal operation. Although Incident II involved 76 planets around 21 stars, it seems that life in those places wasn't quite as severely affected as down here. Of course, they do suffer from the particular aspects of Inc. II indigenous to their planets (and of the cross-restimulation they receive from their Earth-trapped ridges), but that's nothing compared to here. Also they have bodies and GE aberrations, and then they have their Incident I which every thetan in this particular universe has in one form or another.
For most thetans Inc. I served as an entry ticket to Xenu's game (for the fun of it); whereas for a few it was a serious issue and their reason for coming to this universe in the first place (referring to the more involved pro-Xenu and contra-Xenu guys).
Having a body, a GE and a Xenu connection through Inc. I, are features shared by all beings who physically live on planets.
Those that never incarnated but stayed aloft, still have an Inc. I problem. They are extremely easy to audit, though. Occasionally one bumps into one of them as one follows up a particular line of interest on the meter. All they need is receiving an R-Factor on the matter ("Xenu's game over" etc.) and being asked a few questions pertaining to their personal first involvement with Xenu, and - whoosh! - there blow the connecting theta quanta.
They just never thought about the matter in terms of having become other- determined. It never bothered them sufficiently as to notice it.
Freeing beings in this fashion is of extreme importance not only for their personal well-being but even more so in terms of universal politics (which is one step up from galactic politics). Because anyone who has recognized his Xenu-connection is not in Xenu's valence any longer and can make decisions which are not part of Xenu's scheme, i.e. decisions which won't contribute to further condensing theta quanta by gravitational pull, eventually turning everything into solid rock. Anyone not in Xenu's valence will evaluate things differently. In fact, strictly speaking he isn't even part of this universe any more! He will be in touch with other universes existing parallel to this one. All of which would help getting this one sorted out.
The experiment has lasted long enough, after all.
Hubbard A Fruitcake?
It has been said that the materials of OT 1-3 reflected Ron Hubbard's own case, were a dramatization of his personal past, were sloppily researched, and so on. Be that as it may. As a C/S I don't expect anyone to "believe" these data. I dont want people to believe them! I just want these data to be duplicated, understood, and used in session. With all due skepticism.
Each time I put someone on Solo 1-3 I can't believe that he gets reads, pictures and all the rest of it! It's a surprise each and every time.
So do they get their reads on a fantasy movie they have mocked up in their mind? Perhaps they do. But even then it would be well worth flattening the button that was hit, because somehow it resolves real charge and very positive changes result from it, "true" or not.
Any reading item must be taken to an F/N, irrespective of all possible interpretations. That's the long and short of auditing. So whether you consider Solo 1-3 fact or fiction, there is no way around running it when it reads on you.
Mystical Traditions
Anyone who understands traditional esoterics will immediately see that OT 2 and 3 are an initiation of the highest calibre. To sell these levels on the front counter at throw-away prices doesn't do them justice.
Look for example at Mozart's opera "The Magic Flute". It contains an exact description of a top notch Freemason initiation. And with that it relates back to the ancient Isis cult. In either case it is expected of a person that he should be courageous enough to expose himself to terrifying scenes play-acted especially for him by prior arrangement, such as being alone inside a tomb with skulls rattling about, that he (more importantly) should be able to stand up to the pictures thereby restimulated in his mind, and that he (most importantly) should come out with the recognition of the spirit being stronger than mest and of spiritual survival being tied up with sticking to one's guns and not violate one's honour and integrity.
And what does one find in the "Magic Flute" if not the very archetypes all initiations deal with, namely Xenu and Yatrus! Mozart represents them as the Queen of the Night (Xenu) who has to surrender her realm and power to Sarastro (Yatrus). It's almost like Mozart had read "The Pied Pipers" before composing his opera! (The Freemasons of his day didn't particularly like Mozart's revelations. Too close to the truth. Mozart was killed soon after the "Magic Flute" was put on stage in 1791.)
To evaluate Hubbard's work fairly, it has to be understood in this context. His OT levels are an initiation to the most hidden compartments of the mind of Earth-dwelling homo sapiens with the intention to produce a full-blown restimulation of his reactive bank.
And as it goes with all initiations: the person who isn't ready for them won't get anything out of them. One doesn't even have to keep them a secret! Reading a datum with one's eyes is one thing, yet being prepared to receive it into one's mind, quite another. (Which makes it alright to write about it.)
Bill Robertson's Contribution.
After this brief glance over the philosophical, political and historical ramifications of the matter (extensively covered in LK3), let us turn to the practical side of things and look at the peculiarities of each of these Solo Levels from the bottom to the top.
Please bear in mind that this is the way I do it and perhaps not the way it's done in other places. But doing it this way, I can assure you, will give you results.
I did my OT 1-3 at St. Hill U.K. in the late seventies, and it was a very unenlightening experience. The subject was so hushed up that not even the supervisor would answer questions! I didn't understand anything. And did it all wrong, needless to say. (Quite by accident I had a win, though. Probably wasn't intended.)
Things started brightening up for me when I met William Brenton Robertson ("Captain Bill") at the beginning stages of his Excalibur research. Robertson introduced me to the way he had done his OT 1-3 on the Flagship sometime in the late sixties, as C/Sed by Ron Hubbard, and that opened the door to a new and fruitful understanding of the matter.
Bill died in 1991, but amongst us OT folks that doesn't really matter. So thanks, Bill! Good job you did there.
SOLO 1
Solo 1 consists of 13 steps. It is done outside in crowded places. The solo auditor walks about counting people, comparing people with each other or himself, comparing individuals with groups, etc., as stated in the 13 instructions. Each step is done "to a cognition", as the instructions say.
The action is started on the meter with "rudiments to an F/N". As it's a major action you don't want any distraction, so you have the solo auditor start with an F/N (not just a TA check as the materials state).
Next the solo auditor is handed the sheet containing his instructions. The 13 steps are best kept inside a plastic wrapper covered by a blank sheet of paper so that one can't read them.
The solo auditor is given the following instruction: "Go to the nearest supermarket or shopping mall or airport, wherever there are plenty of people, and study these people with respect to certain characteristics until you have a cognition. Take a note pad along so you can keep worksheets. Once you are there you pull the blank cover sheet off instruction number 1, study the instruction, and do what it says. It may tell you that you are to count men with red noses until you have a cognition. So you just do that and no more."
"A cognition" in this particular context does not mean that the solo auditor's case will explode in smithereens. It doesn't have to be a cog of the mind- shattering variety at all. "A cognition" simply means: the first thought that comes to mind whilst doing the action.
It does not have to be a new realization. It may be a realization the solo auditor has already had before. He may have already noticed years ago that men with red noses more often than not smell of booze, but this may not come to his mind immediately as he reads his instructions but only after counting 35 men with red noses. Good. So he writes on his note pad: "Counted 35 men with red noses. Realized they all smell of booze." This way he goes through his 13 steps.
Should the solo auditor actually have a mindshattering realization he would end off at that point and return to his auditing room. Doing the remaining instructions might spoil it for him.
So he goes off and does that. When he comes back you tell him this: "Now sit down at your meter and review what has happened whilst you were outside. Scan over the various experiences and realizations you have had. Rehabilitate some aspects of it as needed. Handle any out ruds. End off with an F/N. Don't try to make any sense out of this. Explanations will be given when you are on Solo 3. Just take it easy."
Only that last F/N is truly the end of his session! The session began with him getting an F/N, it continued with him walking about doing his instructions, it ended with an F/N.
When he is through with all that he hands his folder in. You, as C/S, study it. You will detect sentences like: "Individuals are nicer than groups", "all people are different", "I'm not like other people" and such. It invariably happens that way.
What sense does that make? Well, it's the boss thetan giving indications to his congealed mass of entities who all think they are one. Or it's the boss thetan picking up the originations of his congealed crew and acknowledging it. In either case a long-forgotten stable datum is put into the system: "You are all individuals! You are not all one. You may be part of a mass, but you are not the mass!"
This puts fine hairline fissures into the solid concrete block called the R6 bank that the solo auditor (along with most thetans on this planet) carries around with him. Technically, it works by the basic tool of "indication of a correct item".
These fine fissures won't appear if the person has his attention riveted on the problems of his immediate life. Too subtle! But as these fissures are the necessary prerequisite to the next level to come, Solo 2, you must make sure that the lower bridge of that solo auditor stands on good and strong foundations!
SOLO 2
Theory
Solo Level 2 cracks the solid block of congealed entities the average Earth- dweller is identified with, and breaks it to pieces. These pieces are then auditable individually. This is done on Solo 3.
Solo 1 drives fissures into the block, Solo 2 cracks it, Solo 3 cleans up the debris. Excalibur goes a step further and cleans up the bits stuck to the back of one's coat. It undoes the specifically personal identification of the solo auditor with the R6 bank, and it handles "theta electronics", i.e. transmitting devices connecting one with groups one would prefer not to be connected with.
The congealed mass of entities referred to came about this way: the C.C. implant 1,5 quadrillion years ago was done on individual thetans. It was repeated 75 million years ago as part of Incident II and was the first implant after the explosion. Yet at that point it was not done on individual thetans (as before) but on groups of BTs.
Very messy indeed!
It was followed by a further implant series called the OT 2 implants. Then followed the 36 day marathon implant containing all the facets of "modern civilization" dramatized today.
What you get as a result of this is a very congealed mass of very solidly packed-together theta quanta. This is what needs breaking up as a prerequisite to auditing the actual Incident II story.
The level of OT 2 gets its name from the "OT 2" implant mentioned above. It used to be audited straight after Solo 1. Yet since 1978, when Dianetic Clear and Natural Clear were announced, people were put on OT 1 and OT 2 without having done their C.C.. This is a skipped gradient as well as a disastrous mistake.
Before 1978 it was thought that Clear was to be the result of auditing the Clearing Course Implant (C.C.). By the definition of Clear, this cannot be the case. The ability of Clear is one thing and the GPMs of the C.C. quite another. No reason to assume that auditing the C.C. should make Clears. One doesn't necessarily lead to the other.
The C.C. is just one particular segment of the bank, that's all. Anyone able to hold the cans without fainting, can do it. Which means that in order to do it, one would have to be pretty clear already!
Ron at that time worked on the theory that a thetan is basically a pure being except for his being soiled by dirty engram pictures from the GE. So he assumed that all one had to do to make a Clear is disentangle the thetan from the grips of the GE and its engrams (LK1/p. 159).
This entanglement started 1.5 quadrillion years ago when the C.C. implant was given originally. At the time it was already commonplace for thetans to own GEs. So the C.C. was the first implant given to thetan and GE simultaneously. It welded them together (LK3/ch. 4.2).
To get back to our argument: before 1978 everybody had to do the C.C. materials. It could take hundreds of hours. Then, with the announcement of Dianetic Clear and Natural Clear, the C.C. was called off and people were put right on to OT 1 and OT 2. Apart from the fact that they were badly prepared casewise (and quite often not even Clear in terms of ability) this constitutes a skipped gradient: the C.C. was left off.
Look at the chain of events: earliest, the original C.C., 1.5 quadrillion years ago. Then, 75 million years ago, its repetition during Inc. II. Then, only moments later, the OT 2 implant.
You must run this entire chain from early to late so as to crack the implant aspect of Inc. II. This is done on Solo 2. Only this way can you break through to the actual story of Inc. II (which is then run on Solo 3).
Consequently Solo 2 consists of two sections: first, running the C.C.; second, running the OT 2 GPMs.
Practice
This is how you do it: as you know the contents of this chain of implants you already know the basic on the chain (the original C.C.). So you don't have to start late and go earlier similar as one would ordinarily do it in dianetic auditing, no, you can actually start at the basic. The method used is not listening-style auditing (narrative) but "indication of correct item" - one of the basic tools of auditing mentioned earlier.
The structure of the C.C.: it consists of five implant sections (designated "A to E" in the materials) which were given 10 times in this sequence (10 "runs"). This is what you study on your Solo 2 course (see the checksheet in the appendix).
Start your first solo session on Solo 2 with a big friendly TR-0, space wide open, and speak the following words to the tens of thousands of congealed entities all around: "Hello, all of you! We are now going to run the C.C. implant that occurred 1.5 quadrillion years ago. Each of you please go to your own first item in the first run of the first GPM!"
This often produces good reads, even BDs. In this case repeat the instruction to flat (no further reaction) or F/N. Then you take your platens, covered with a blank sheet of paper, pull the sheet down a bit, read the first line, give it to "them" with good TR-1 and note down all reads.
You as the solo auditor don't have to believe a word of this. It is perfectly alright to consider this mere fantasy. That doesn't matter. You'll get reads anyway, provided you keep your auditor presence with good TRs and no attempts to invalidate anything that's coming to you. Maintain an open attitude and keep your opinion on the matter to yourself as you would in any session.
And you will get your reads. Quite often pages of them.
It's like TR-0 bullbaited. The implant commands as listed in the materials (called "platens") hit a button in you. Or not. If they do, the button is repeated until it is flat.
On TR-0 nobody wants to know why the student is reacting. That's beside the point. What matters is that the button causes a reaction, and that the repetition of the button flattens that reaction.
With the Solo Levels - and any other auditing, actually - it isn't any different. No matter how bizarre the story may sound: if it reads it's run. That's the duty of the auditor. It's actually part of the code.
You don't have to believe what the auditee tells you, whether he is an incarnate thetan, a disincarnate thetan or an entity. You don't want to know why there is charge, it's quite enough to see that there is charge. You help the auditee handle his charge. That's the long and short of it. After all it's his universe, not yours.
Keep It Light!
When you audit on Solo 2, do it lightly. The idea is that there is this huge charge hung up in mid-air and you have to some extent identified with it, and now that you are addressing it, it will gradually deflate and that shows on the meter as reads. Like letting the air slowly out of the inner tube of this huge truck tyre now that one finally found the valve.
So audit it lightly. It ought to fall into your lap. Don't force it. Don't exert even more pressure on those entities than they have to bear already! Your meter will sieze up if you do.
When you don't get reads on the first command on the platen, go on. Go down a half a dozen commands, see what happens. Go down a dozen. See what happens. Once it starts reading you can always go back up to the top and pick up the reads that will be available then. That's part of the tech of it (see the C.C. instruction book for details).
It's either something or nothing: charge or no charge. When it's something, you drain all the charge out of it, to F/N. When it's nothing, you acknowledge the fact that there is no charge and get an F/N on that. Either way you get an F/N.
To say it again: keep it light.
One doesn't have to have that sort of case, not necessarily. Some have it more than others. It may not be your personal case anyway. Perhaps you weren't there when it happened. Perhaps you connected up with this particular data bank fairly recently only. Or perhaps you just never connected up with it at all! Depends entirely on your level of awareness and havingness, as pointed out further up.
So it's alright not to have reads and not to have that part of the case - but then you should have a clean F/N on that fact! If not, there is something fishy.
F/Ns And The EP
F/Ns play a special role in this sort of auditing. You call a command off the platens, you get reads, TR-3 on the command, more reads, TR-3, more reads, TR-3, no reads. You go down to the next line on the platens. And so on, in this fashion. When the reads begin to thin out, you go up a few lines and start working downwards from there.
When you get an F/N you simply leave that line and go on to the next one down, honoring the little key-out that occurred there. When you come up to that same line later on, having jumped up from a few lines further down, you simply carry on after this F/N.
And if you did only that, if you just followed this little rule of "when I get an F/N I go down to the next line on the platens", you would sooner or later get the following phenomenon: you call a command off the platens, you get reads, TR-3 on the command, more reads, TR-3, more reads, TR-3, F/N. Next line, you call the command off the platens, you get reads, TR-3 on the command, more reads, TR-3, F/N. Next line, you call the command off the platens, you get reads, TR-3, F/N. Next line, you call the command off the platens, you get reads, F/N. Next line, you call the command off the platens, F/N. Next line, F/N. Next Line, F/N. Next line, F/N.
Don't take it further. That's it. Don't force it. That's the EP. The solo auditor usually feels like "something cracked in my space". Rehab in case of overrun (which will occur if you try to squeeze more reads out of the action than it readily gives).
Note that the EP may occur whilst doing the clay demos on the checksheet. Some people get extremely emotional on these demos. The C/S must take this into consideration when looking at the ensuing session phenomena of that person.
When the EP has occurred on the original C.C. at 1,5 quadrillion years ago, you don't need to audit the repetition of the C.C. at 75 million years ago. You cracked the basic and that's it.
However, you do have to run the next implant on that chain, the one that was given right after the repetition of the C.C., and that's the OT 2 implant. Same procedure as described for the C.C.: first an R-Factor (with "Inc. II" and "75 million years ago" replacing "C.C." and "1,5 quadrillion years ago"), and then running each line till the whole thing F/Ns.
That's the end of Solo 2.
SOLO 3
After Solo 2 the huge congealed mass encrusting your aura, consisting of theta quanta, ridges and entities, has broken up into chunks. On Solo 3 these are called up and audited one by one. Ron Hubbard called them BTs and Clusters.
Auditing Style
On this level a different auditing style is used. On Solo 1 and 2 it was auditing by direct indication of charge. On Solo 3 this is done also (on each step of the Inc. II and I sequence), but on each incident it might broaden to a narrative, and of course one goes down a chain (from Inc. II to Inc. I, earlier similar incidents and earlier universes). All these are basic tools packaged up for a specific purpose.
You as the solo auditor know the contents of the Inc. II story, at least in its general framework as stated on the OT 3 platens. You don't have to find it out from each individual BT or Cluster. The story consists of a sequence of six steps. You simply add "Go to ...!" as a prefix to each step and intend the BT through the incident (LK3/appx. B).
What you are actually saying to that BT is: "There is this incident 75 million years ago and it started with a capture, remember? Everybody got shot and then they were hoovered up. And then the freezing, remember? And the transport, remember?" And so on. Each time you say "remember?" you get a read, ranging from tick to BD. You are indicating to the BT: this is what has happened.
The BT will follow your indications all the way down the story of the incident and blow (disappear, disconnect, evaporate, as-is). Which means all the theta quanta it consists of return to their owner, wherever he may be at the time of your session (either on Earth or on one of those 76 planets).
If the BT doesn't blow, you go through the story a second and perhaps a third time (that's the narrative aspect of Solo 3 auditing). And if he doesn't blow then, or if going through it repeatedly was the wrong action, tightened the needle and drove the TA up, you go earlier and take him through Inc. I (that's running chains). Use the same method of adding "Go to ...!" as a prefix to the Inc. I sequence described in the platens.
And if the BT doesn't blow then, you ask: "Earlier similar incident when little foreign-made theta bits were stuck to you?". When that reads you TR-3 the question and keep TR-3ing it until its flat or you feel a blow with an F/N.
Still no blow: "Earlier universe? A time when you were self-determined and purposeful and winning?" TR-3 to F/N.
In either case you don't need answers or pictures. It's alright to do it by needle response only.
Note that the needle may not have the time to actually F/N as the next BT or Cluster is sitting right there already, wanting to be noticed. Kills the F/N, see? Such a throng! So you ask: "BT already blown? Next BT already there?", and run him through his Inc. II.
Standard And Trouble Shooting Questions
On Solo 3 there is no fix you couldn't get out of by asking a few simple questions. There is a limited number of possibilities only, and when things don't go smoothly you just check through these possibilities in a yes/no pattern. The needle tells the tale.
Here is the standard sequence of questions:
"Anyone for Inc. II?" Read. Locate the entity. It reads when you have found the exact spot in or around your body or in the space around you.
"Is it a BT or a Cluster?" Whatever reads, take it up. In either case you run Inc. II. A Cluster will break up sooner or later. It might happen on any step of the Inc. II sequence.
You don't run a Cluster through Inc. I! Inc. I was done on individual thetans. A Cluster you run through Inc. II until it breaks up, if need be repeatedly. Should you miss that moment the needle will tighten and the TA rise. "Cluster already broken up?" BD. Great.
And then: "A BT for Inc. II?" Read, locate, run II, I, E/I, E/U, blow. Repeat the questions until all the BTs from the Cluster just broken up are through. Questions goes flat. Return to "Anyone for II?" and proceed as before.
Any trouble like needle going tight and TA rising, just ask (depending on where this happens): "Should Inc. II be re-run?" - "Inc. I available to be run?" - "Should Inc. I be re-run?" - "Earlier similar incident available?" - "Earlier universe?"
Or: "BT already blown?" (F) - "Different BT on the line?" (sF) - "Go to the capture!" Etc.
Or: "More than one BT on the line?" (LF) - "Alright, which one wants running first?" (F) - "Ok, go to the capture!" Etc.
Or: "Is this BT really a Cluster?"
Or: "Is this Cluster really a Cumulative Cluster?" (That's several clusters caked up with each other. See the explanation further down.)
Or, when all else fails: "Overts on Inc. II (or Inc. I, respectively)?" (sF) - "Ok, run Inc. II from the overt side", and just go through the steps as usual. At some point he who was involved in the overt part of it to start with, made a mistake, his craft crashed and this way he got into the motivator side of it. The motivator side will run out after the charge on the overt side was recognized. That's all it takes. When they become difficult and want individual handling, use the Excalibur command sequence on them.
Here is a little clean-up process in case Solo 3 starts to go sluggish. Sluggishness is a sign of BTs having jammed up. They are ready to blow and just wait for a final acknowledgement. A BT bottleneck! To let them rush out, start with the earliest incident:
1. "Anyone for an earlier universe?" - Read. - "Rehab it!" - TR-3 this to flat or F/N.
2. "Anyone for an earlier similar to Inc. I?" - Read. - "Run through the incident" - Take each BT to blow/FN, if need be by going earlier.
3. Repeat question 2 to flat or F/N.
4. "Anyone for Inc. I?" - Read - Run the incident. Take the BT to blow/FN, go earlier as needed (as in 2 and 1 above).
5. Repeat question 4 to flat or F/N.
6. Now you are back to normal and go on with the usual: "Anyone for Inc.
II?"
Don't worry about no pictures. It's alright to run Solo 3 by meter read and faint images only. Or without any images at all. They will turn on good and juicy on Excalibur. Always do.
And don't worry about all of this being "science fiction". You give your commands, you get your pictures, you run them out. A button has been pushed, you repeat it till it's flat. Same routine as TR-0 bullbaited.
Just because some Earthlings cannot confront Incident II doesn't mean it didn't happen.
Don't go into the 36 days so to avoid cross-restimulation and freewheeling. You push one BT too far, beyond the implant image called "the pilot", and the rest of them may go off like firecrackers. Means sleepless nights for solo auditor as well as C/S.
Handle overrestimuation ("freewheeling") by: "How many BTs and Clusters in restimulation?" Get the figure with a read, indicate it (TR-2), get another read. Then: "Each of you go to your own capture!" TR-3 till flat.
Repeat this little process till flat. Then go back to the standard sequence of questions.
Take lots of vitamin C and B1 ("GUK formula"). Take niacin. This strengthens the energy field of the GE and keeps the entities at a distance. Still no sleep: don't take valium, drink beer! And good luck. It might be tough.
What's a Cumulative Cluster? It's Inc. II clusters caked up with each other because of later similar incidents restimulating Inc. II, such as explosions, fires, heavy impact, shock, atom bombs on TV, whatever.
When you get a read on "Cluster?" at the start of the sequence and the Cluster doesn't run well on Inc. II, you suspect it's a Cumulative Cluster, ask the question on the meter, get a read, and then run the chain of mutual incidents (when they awoke and clung to each other) from late to early: "Latest mutual incident?" - Picture flashes up. - "What was it?" - Picture becomes clearer. - "When was it?" / "Where?" each to LF or BD - "Is there an earlier mutual incident?" - "What? When? Where?" - "Yet an earlier one?" - "What? When? Where?" - "Yet an earlier one?" - And you arrive at running Inc. II quite naturally, because that's when Clusters were originally formed, and you can handle the separate Clusters in the standard way.
The Solo 3 Program
General note: There is no need to start a session with an F/N. The next lot of BTs have already lined up for auditing, so of course there won't be an F/N at session start.
Another note: When there are distractions from the program by trouble in life: Run 6 ruds on the situation or the terminal and determine ownership. Then go back to the step on the program you are on. (From this stage in auditing checking ownership of charge must be part of normal procedure regardless of what action is run.)
1. After doing the clay demos on his Solo 3 course the solo auditor's BTs and Clusters are wide awake and eager to be released from their 75 million year captivity. The clay demos have caused sufficient restimulation for a whole load of them to be ready for auditing. So all one has to ask is the starter question: "Anyone for Inc. II?" - read - locate where it is - read - "BT or Cluster?" - read - "Go to the capture!" And so on.
You simply carry on like that. Break up Clusters by taking them through Inc. II. Individual BTs you take through Inc. II and Inc. I, earlier similar incidents (E/Is) and earlier universes (E/Us) to blow. You carry on till the starter question goes flat. No further reads on it, F/N.
2. "Any BTs or Clusters in or on my body?" Travel with your attention through your body, scan through skin, inner organs, bones, limbs. You'll feel attracted to certain spots. When they read on the meter: "Is that a BT or Cluster?" And there you go. Until question 2 goes flat on the meter.
3. "Any BTs or Clusters in the space around the body?" Locate and run. Until the question goes flat.
4. When your attention on the body flattens off (2) you will feel quite naturally drawn into the space around you (3). When that flattens off you will feel drawn back to the body. So keep alternating 2 and 3. Just go where your attention goes. Until that's flat and you get a definite and final F/N on questions 2 and 3.
5. "Any BT's or Clusters being my body or parts of it?" That's asking for full identification with the body or a body part. Quite different to question 3. Locate and handle as usual: Inc. II - Inc. I - earlier similar to Inc. I - earlier universe. Never change that routine.
6. "Any BTs or Clusters being my space?" Very interesting stuff! They look like soap bubbles, sometimes encapsulating one's entire body.
7. "Any BTs or Clusters being me?" Or: " ... being Joe?" (Put your own name in.) Locate and run as usual.
8. This one is a little more complex: a) Go in session and make a list of drugs, medicines, injections and alcoholic drinks you have taken. Just note down anything that comes to mind and how big the read is. b) Take a brief break and establish the sequence of the items by the size of their reads. c) Take each reading item up with the question: "Regarding aspirin (for example) are there any BT's and Clusters in restimulation?" Locate and handle. Repeat the question till aspirin (or whatever) F/Ns. Then go to the next reading item. The EP should be an F/Ning drug list. (Don't use any old drug list from years ago! Make a new one.)
9. Another complex one. It works on the theory that any incident that traumatized the body may cause BT's and Clusters to wake up and cling to the picture of that particular incident, thus forming new clusters or Cumulative Clusters. This process is called "Milazzo" in the OT 3 platens, after the Sizilian harbour town where it was developed. a) In session, make a list of illnesses, accidents, injuries, unconsciousnesses, operations, anaesthesia. b) Take a break, establish the sequence of the items by the size of their reads. c) Pick up the first item with the question: "During this incident, was a Cluster formed?" - Read. - d) Scan over the incident to re-familiarize yourself with it, in other words flatten it on your own time track. - e) Then do a Date/Locate, finding the exact point in the incident when that Cluster was formed. This should give you a BD which means that the Cluster has broken up. - f) Then ask: "Any BTs or Clusters for Inc. II?" and do your usual routine until the question goes flat or F/Ns. Then return to step c) regarding the next item on your list. And so on until all items on the list have F/Ned.
10. This is the last one. Picks up any remaining yet undetected charge of oneself, BTs, Clusters, other people or bodyless thetans. a) Assess 6 rudiments with the prefix: "Regarding Solo 3, is there (rud)?" - Read. - b) Check for ownership of charge: "Whose charge is that? BT? Cluster? Another's? My own?" - c) Run what reads the biggest, to F/N. Then back to a) and re-assess.
Repeat steps a) to c) as often as it takes to F/N all ruds with regard to Solo 3. And then you know that you are through. No question.
|
