IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division RELIGIOUS TECHNOLOGY CENTER ) ) Plaintiff ) v. ) Civil Action no. 95-1107-A ) ARNALDO PAGLIARINA LERMA ) ) Defendant ) FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF PERMANENT INJUNCTION The Court having granted plaintiff Religious Technology Center's ("RTC") Motion for Summary Judgement for Copyright Infringement against defendant Arnaldo Lerma and having entered its Memorandum Opinion on October 4, 1996, and for the reasons stated therein, hereby enters a final judgment in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant in the amount of$2,500.00. For the reasons stated in open court on January 3, 1997, no award of attorney's fees and litigation expenses is made; however, plaintiff has the right to seek those other costs permitted under Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d)(1). RTC is also entitled to a permanent injunction against Lerma arising out of his acts of copyright infringement, accordingly it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that defendant Arnaldo Lerma, his agents, servants, employees, attorneys and all persons in active concert or participating with him, or any of them, who receive actual notice of this order by personal service or
otherwise ARE PERMANENTLY RESTRAINED AND ENJOINED from: 1. Directly or indirectly, in whole or in part, publishing, reproducing, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative works based upon the Advanced Technology Works of Religious Technology Works or Religious Technology Center ("RTC"), as listed in Attachment A hereto, or any of them, in any media now known or hereafter developed in any time, place or fashion, and in particular from engaging in any such acts in, or, or in connection with any computer, database, information service, electronic bulletin board service, network, storage facility or archives, or other electronic bulletin board service, network or facility, including, without limitation, the transmitting or loading of any such materials onto, or downloading any copies of them from any such device, service, network or facility. Moreover, all such copies which defendant, his agents, servants, employees, and attorneys and those in active concert or participation with them have copied or caused to be copied onto any such device, service, network, or facility must be removed from such device, service, network or facility; and 2. Causing or inducing any other person to engage in any of the foregoing prohibited acts. Copies of any of the Advanced Technology materials which were found on the computer media seized from defendant Lerma, pursuant to the Write of Seizure issued by this Court, identified in Attachment 3, are unauthorized copies of the copyrighted, unpublished literary works of L. Ron Hubbard. Those copies, and any other copies of Advanced Technology works, as listed in 2
Attachment A, which Mr. Lerma may have in his possession, custody or control, shall be surrendered forthwith to counsel for plaintiff for impoundment, and in no event later than 48 hours from the date of this Order. The foregoing shall not preclude defendant's counsel from retaining copies of the Advanced Technology materials and the hard drive which was seized subject to this Court's Order of Seizure -- on a "for eyes of counsel only" basis pursuant to paragraph 10 of the September 7, 1995, Protective Order -- until this civil action, and any appeals thereof, are concluded. Nothing in this injunction precludes defendant Arnaldo Lerma, his agents, servants, employees, attorneys and any persons in active concert or participation with him from exercising their First Amendment rights to freedom of speech, press and religion, nor does it bar them from their right under the copyright laws of the United States to make fair use of any RTC copyrighted material. The provisions of this Order of Permanent Injunction do not apply to, nor are they intended in any respect to affect, the litigation in RTC v. F.A.C.T. NET, Inc., Lawrence Wollersheim and Robert Penny, Civil Action No. 95-K-2143 (D. Colo. 1995). The Clerk is directed to forward copies of this Order to counsel of record. Entered this 28th day of April, 1997.Leonie M. Brinkema United States District Judge
Read also the injunction against Grady Ward (Click here)
RELIGIOUS TECHNOLOGY CENTER, a
California non-profit corporation; and
Bridge Publications, Inc., a California
non-profit corporation, Plaintiffs.
v.
NETCOM ON-LINE COMMUNICATION
SERVICES, INC., a Delaware corpora-
tion, Dennis Erlich, an individual; and
Tom Klemesrud, an individual, dba
Clearwood Data Services, Defendants
No. C-95-20091 RMW.
United States District Court,
N.D. California
Sept. 22, 1995
Organizations affiliated with Church of
Scientology brought action against individual
who allegedly posted Church's copyrighted
works on Internet, alleging copyright in-
fringement and trade secret misappropria-
tion. Plaintiffs filed motion for preliminary
injunction and to hold defendant in contempt,
and defendant filed motion to vacate previ-
ously issued writ of seizure.
...
VII. ORDER
For the reasons set forth above, the court
orders as follows:1. Defendant Dennis Erlich and his agents,
servants, and employees, all persons acting
or purporting to act under his authority,
direction or control, and all persons acting
in concert or in participation with any of
them who receive notice of this Order,
shall be and are restrained and enjoined
pending further court order:
a. From all unauthorized reproduction,
transmission, and publication of any of
the works of L. Ron Hubbard that are
protected under the Copyright Act of
1976, as codified in its amended form at
17 U.S.C. 101 et seq. Such works are
found, for the purposes of this order
only, to be those works identified in
Exhibits A and B to the complaint, ex-
cept for item 4 of Exhibit A. A copy of
said exhibits are attached hereto with
item 4 of Exhibit A redacted.
i. Unauthorized reproduction, trans-
mission, or publication includes place-
ment of a copyrighted work into a
computer's hard drive or other stor-
age device; "browsing" the text of a
copyrighted work resident on another
computer through on-screen examina-
tion; scanning a copyrighted work
into a digital file; "uploading" a digital
file containing a copyrighted work
from the computer to a bulletin board
system or other server; "download-
ing" a digital file containing a copy-
righted work from a bulletin board
system or other server to the comput-
er and "quoting" a copyrighted work
that is cited in an on-line message in
sending, responding to or forwarding
that message.
ii. Nothing in this section of the order
shall be construed to prohibit fair use
of such works, as set forth in 17
U.S.C. 107 and interpreted by ap-
plicable case law. Fair use of the
copyrighted material for the purposes
of this order includes use of the
copyrighted work for the purpose of
criticism, news reporting, teaching,
scholarship, and research but does
not include: (1) use of the material
for a commercial purpose where the
user stands to profit from exploita-
tion of the copyrighted material with-
out paying the customary price or
giving the usual consideration or use
that would have a significant effect
on the potential market value of the
copyrighted work; (2) use which ful-
fills the demand for the original
work; or (3) use of the heart of the
work -- no more of a work may be
taken than is necessary to make any
accompanying comment understanda-
ble. With respect to unpublished
materials, the amount of copied mate-
rial must comprise only a very small
percentage of the copyrighted works
both from a quantitative and a quali-
tative standpoind.
iii. The prior postings by defendant
Erlich that form the basis of this or-
der do not qualify as fair use primarily
because of the quantity of the material
posted and the very limited transfor-
mative use made of those materials.
Identical or similar postings are there-
fore enjoined.
b. From destroying, altering, concealing
or removing from the district in which
defendant Erlich resides, any reproduc-
tion, copy, facsimile, excerpt or deriva-
tive of any work of L. Ron Hubbard that
is described in Exhibit A or B including
all such works returned pursuant to this
order. Defendant Erlich or his counsel
shall safely retain possession of any such
items.
c. A condition of this preliminary injunc-
tion is that a $25,000 bond shall be post-
ed (or continued in place) pursuant to
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(c).
...