Flight 77 and the Pentagon Crash - What Really Happened Here?

In this Image we can see an ariel path marker in the grass. It is not easily seen on the ground but I am still looking for some ground pictures to back up this satelite picture. However it is a very compeling picture as the masonic all seeing eye is visible here. The actual bottom part of the eye points at the impact point on the pentagon wall and in the approximate flight path that the object that hit the Pentagon took.

What does this mean, well in Illuminati Symbology terms it is like a calling card I would say. Further if what we are seeing here is real then it gives credibility to the fact that the so called Terrorists were Patsies and this ariel marking pattern may have been used to mark the impact point from the air where the pilot or object was suppose to hit the Pentagon. The question is, was this added to this picture or was this ariel marking actually there; I don't know, but still looking for further confirmation so far I haven't found a picture that would be very helpful, although some pictures do show a path marker, but not clear enough for me to say for sure.

Those who do not know who and what the Illuminati are, I suggest that you download and watch David Icke's Lecture on the Illuminati at a later time after you have studied the information here to your satisfaction. In a nutshell the Illuminati is a group of people who are currently controling this planet we live on called Earth.

The only problem with getting verification on the Satellite photo of the all seeing eye is the simple fact that they found it necessary to cover the Pentagon Lawn with stone and sand. I can understand the need of building a road into the area to get heavy equpment in, but the whole lawn? Wouldn't you want to do a through check of the Lawn first for debris etc.? Perhaps also you might find a passport sitting on the Lawn like they found a passport of one of the Hijackers in the debris at the World Trade Center, right?

The Approximate Flight Path:

Now this is important as we will see later there were some light poles knocked down and there is some discussion about the credibility aspects of the poles being knocked down. For now just realize that flight path matches the ariel path marker, the All Seeing Eye embedded on the lawn.

Here we have an Apartment Building in Amsterdam taken out by a 600,000 lb 747.

Much Larger Hole don't you think?

Picture taken on Sep 15th

Joe Vialls wrote an interesting web page comparing the Amsterdam crash too the Pentagon crash. In it he makes the argument that the wings basicly snap off in a crash and that the fuselage makes the hole and the wings fold in as they snap and go into the hole with the plane. He sites that the Amsterdam crash the width of the damage in the apartment is less than the width of the plane from wing tip to wing tip. In this case it appears to be a very large hole in the Apparment and a tiny one in the Pentagon.

Somewhat more familar image of what a 767 can do in creating a sizable hole.
It would seem that in this picture you can actually see the wing marks.  Also
Just as a side note, do you see any fire burning other than a couple small ones?
Interesting the building would collapse do to a non existant fire don't you think?

Onward to the entry hole(s)...

Now isn't this interesting. Why would anyone go to the trouble of writing the words,
Punch Out on the Pentagon wall?

The same hole but a more further
away picture of it. Much
more debris here now

It is difficult to verify the location of this hole and when the picture was taken. but it is of obvious interest to the FEMA people in the picture. This is the entry point that workers used to get into the "crash" site. Some people believe that a missile entered through this point in the wall. It is difficult to to know for sure, but it is possible.

Here is a picture of the actual hole made in the Pentagon:

Click Picture for a bigger enhanced view

Now what we see here is debris being pushed away from the hole. The steel columns near the impact are not pushed in but pushed sideways, like what would happen if a bomb went off, not like what would happen if a plane hit it. You can see a hole big enough for the fuelage, but no damage from the wings. The smoke covers up the arching hole, so it is difficult to get a clear understanding of what the damage really is.

I do find it interesting that with a 260,000 lb plane you don't see much of any aircraft debris, if at all. Another obvious question is, What are spools of heavy guage wire doing on the west lawn of the Pentagon?

Here is an interesting pdf file that concludes that a bomb was set off in the basement of the building, based on the damage done to the building. Flight 77 - Geometry of the Event. Also the damage shown in this picture would support a more head on hit rather than an angular hit.

The Picture bellow even shows it more clearly that although some of the space has been blown out, the pylons remaining with stood the force of a 269,434 lb plane doing about 400 MPH, plowing into it?

Now for the aftermath pic. If the plane did hit the Pentagon on an angle, why is it then that the damage done is not consistant with that angle? The Pentagon wall just collapsed straight down onto itself, but there is no angular damage is there?

Examining the Possibility of Planted Evidence (Like that never happens right?)
It was reported that both black boxes were recovered from the Pentagon Crash. Okay then, where is it? Surely a picture of it would be nice as they seem to want to show the public and with all the media around shouldn't be a problem right? Well perhaps they lied... I know hard to believe as it may sound, perhaps they lied. Here is the news article about the recovery of the black box.
Further I find it hard to believe that a black box would survive when there is apparently nothing of the plane that did...

Lets take a walk through to the crash site. Click on the link bellow to load a video taken on September 11th at at the Pentagon. Watch for debris. You will see a piece of debris in the video that looks like a piece of landing gear. However the gear itself is not burnt, twisted or damaged in any way. Odd don't you think? The wheel is still inflated and not burnt off.

Video Showing the Collapsed Building and Possible Landing Gear

A Smoking Gun:
You can clearly see from this video that there was never a huge gapping hole created in the Pentagon wall. The hole is only one story high, first floor and all the other floors collapsed down on top of it. There is no way a Boeing 757 could ever have gone through there. This leaves us with two questions:

What did hit the pentagon and the other relates to who was involved in 9/11 that created this massive lie? It is easy to point fingers at the adminstration as they most certainly are suspects in my mind, however they couldn't do it alone. How many others were involved in this cover-up and treason?

Now I matched the gear up with the Global Hawk Rear Landing Gear. Again it is difficult to know for sure, but it does look like a possible match. Another possiblity is that it may be a welders basket that holds Acetylene and Oxygen tanks. I am still sitting on the fence on this one.

Side Note:
Again what is that gear doing there in a conspicuous location. It seems as though it was planted. The other alternative is that somehow it got kicked out of the building on impact? When they are trying to tell us that an entire 757 simply disintegrated on impact into oblivion and we have piece of landing gear here, it makes me wonder what did hit the Pentagon!

Compare the landing gear with a 757.

Here we have another piece of wreckage. The color seems to be a lighter blue than that used by American Airlines. However the piece is also too small to corrispond with the lettering on the 757 paint job according to other analysis work done on this web page. Just scroll down a ways to see it.

Clearly the blue part of the color is wrong and it supports the theory that something made to look like an American Airlines 757 is what actually hit the Pentagon.

A model of the Painted Missile created by a French Artist. Click the Picture for the video.
No one Keeps a secret in this Country, No one...
Mike Walter - A USA Today Reporter - An apparent Witness to Pentagon Crash?

Downed Light Poles:

Pole 1

The thing I find so interesting about this picture is the glass on the pavement in proximity of the pole. A jet going roughly 400 MPH hitting the pole and the glass from the light lands near where the pole is. The glass should have shattered the instant the plane hit the pole and land in a totally different area. This pole looks like it was just tossed into this position. What is also interesting in all the pole pictures is that the poles seem to have snapped off at the base. The mid section of the pole isn't even bent or dented, which is where the maximum stress would be as the pole bends.

Pole 1

Pole 1

Pole 3

Pole 4

Pole 4

Pole 5

Normal Base of a the Light Poles.

It appears that some of the light poles were ripped completly out, base and all.

Safe Breakaway Light Poles:
http://www.transpo.com/Transpo_Sheets_PDF/Pole_safe.pdf
Pole 1 may have been a Breakaway type light pole, but the other 3 poles we have pictures of don't appear to have this kind of technology designed into the them.

Note there is no pic I can find of Pole 2. So for now we will analyze these pictures.

In all the pictures I saw of these down poles I did not see any pictures of the where they poles were ripped out or broken.
Witnesses claim that the poles were taken down by the wings of the 757. In every case where a pole was hit no aircraft metal or objects seemed to have come off where the poles were.
A piece of Airplane Debris Found by a downed lamp post. Yup it's a real smoking gun right? Well please explaing where on the American Airlines Beoing 757 wing is there paint that is white? There is some white on the nose cone and on the upper sides of the plane. Now the Global Hawk however does have some versions that are painted white. To further this if this is all that was found after hitting 5 poles I am truly amazed! I don't believe that this would be off any plane that hit 5 poles as I discuss bellow.
Considering the sheer stregnth of the poles I find it hard to imagine that wing wasn't severly damaged. The other thing about the light poles is that the plane was traveling very fast, about 400 MPH. If the plane hit the poles going that speed the poles wouldn't be close the the road or on the road, rather they would be thrown a long way from the road, provdiding they didn't sheer the wings off.
If you examine the area where the poles are lying down you will not see any damage to the grass and the one on the road the glass is

Considering the sheer stregnth of the poles I find it hard to imagine that wing wasn't severly damaged. The other thing about the light poles is that the plane was traveling very fast, about 400 MPH. If the plane hit the poles going that speed the poles wouldn't be close the the road or on the road, rather they would be thrown a long way from the road, provdiding they didn't sheer the wings off. Hence we are talking about 5 poles here not one!

To show what poles do when hit by cars here is one article of many ro read:
Park Marina crash splits car nearly in two

Here we have an example of the damage that can be done on a wooden pole, speed much slower than a plane.

Photo: Gian Luiso

To further this example, think about all the radio towers perched up on all the buildings and around town. They all have aircraft warning lights on them right? What would happen to a plane if it hit just one of those towers, not least to say Five!

Bottomline is we have all seen accident pictures of cars crashing into light poles and know the kind of damage that can be done to car. So what about an airplane wing? The Plane would be a fireball before it even hit the pentagon and probably would have crashed into the lawn first as it would be pulled down by hitting the poles and rupturing fuel tanks in the wings. The Light Poles are planted and a destraction. With a little Photoshop Pro work anything can be manufactured wouldn't you say? However if the poles were down I suspect they wouldn't have been brought down by Flight 77.

A Boeing 757 can carry upto 11,489 Gallons of Fuel. Tanks are located in the under-belly and sometimes in the wings. The fire was limited to outer section and roof areas. The section of the Pentagon hit was only 5 days from completion of some very heavy fortified renovations. Heavy steel beams etc put into the building. Interesting that they were only 5 days away from the renovations when they got hit don't you think? It was interesting how all the fuel spewed out the World Trade Center but nothing spewed out of the Pentagon into the other sections. Odd thing, however if you check on the WTC page you will see that a 767 was fitted with some kind of fuel bomb to increase the drama I guess. The Fuel still burns at around 875 degrees and steel melts at 2800 degrees.

One final point about the poles. The so called terrorists had only about 10 hours simulator flight time a little bit of actual Cesna training and probably some played around with a flight simulator on a home computer from what I have heard on documentries. The It is odd don't you think that the plan would swing around and hit the side of the Pentagon where the arial marker was in the lawn. Also to steer a plane perfectly through 5 lamp poles just skimming the ground is pretty tough for a real pilot let alone amatures under a great deal of stress and chaos. There is no way in my mind that they could have flown the course they did and the course they did fly makes no logical sense. When you are determing to hit something like the pentagon, you don't aim for a particular wall you come in from above and you dive at it. To hit the pentagon the way they did is way beyond their skills and abilities. It is so much easier to just dive in at the Pentagon then to be slaming into Light Poles etc. With the total lack of airplane wreckage, bodies and luggage etc. it makes no sense that a 757 hit the Pentagon at all. There are a number of other supporting websites and theories that support this argument. Just a comment for now. I'll keep working on it.

Just as a side note, put yourself in the terrorists shoes for a moment. If you had a choice of hitting the Pentagon or the west wing of the White House, which target would you pick? I'll leave it at that.

Here is a large debris field:
This is the result of two 747 Crashing into each other. Now watch this video of an F4 Plowing into a Wall. Pay close attention to the wings as the wings do not fold inward they stay the course and actually cut the wall in half!
Video 1 of the F4 hitting the wall
Video 2 of the F4 hitting the wall

In the second video you can clearly see debris being blown back away from the wall. The F4 was completly shattered but parts were blown off and the wings stayed intact. The other factor is the F4 was just about out of fuel as it hit the wall. A missile or a plane would have additional energy in the fuel and/or payload it carried with it.

Considering that the damage to the building pushes the steel collumns to the side and not in is very odd. You think that if a wing could take out a light pole a simple steel collumn would be swiss cheese as well? Again it would seem odd that the building would collapse the way it did based on fire alone. Steel melts at 2800 degrees and the fuel from an aircraft burns at around 875 degrees. The other thing that is very odd is that you can see lots and lots of building debris, but I have yet to find one picture that shows any aircraft debris inside the building at all!

What hit the Pentagon? A Global Hawk Drone, Cruise Missile or a drone made to look like a AA 757?

Something slammed into the Pentagon, but it wasn't a 757. Rumsfeld stated it was a Missile that hit the building during a slip of the ol'tounge. Take a look a this analysis on the missile theory...

Here is a video of the Pentagon Collapsing
What I find interesting about the collapse is that it didn't collapse in a free fall like we saw at the World Trade Center Demolition. The other thing I found interesting was that the fire fighters were not hosing it down during this particular period, why? Perhaps they wanted it to collapse? If there was a chance that someone was still alive but hurt in the upper floors wouldn't you want to rescue them?

The gif video shows the plane impacting the Pentagon. The only problem with this video footage is that it has been altered and can not be fully trusted. The other odd thing I find about this is that the explosion flame has two colors. It almost looks like in the first part of the explosion like it was pasted into the picture or it is the real explosion.The first part of the explosion on the Pentagon wall is most likely a high explosive fast burning fuel, meaning explosive device of some sort. There was a report about steel oil drums placed near the construction area, but of course I have no way of proving that.

Compare the fireball with this fireball created by an Air France A320 Plane Crash
Same Jet Fuel differnt color in the fireball means a differnt type of fuel or perhaps a bomb of some kind?

Now for a Smoking Gun:
A Tomahawk Cruise Missile Explosion against a wall.
The fireball is very similar in color although the size is smaller in this video. Here is a picture which shows the fireball after a little more time is allowed to transpire.

Source Link: http://www.navysite.de/weapons/tomahawk.mpg
For more Pictures, Video and Information on Cruise Missiles Go Here

Since when do shawdows look like this?

Take notice of the white smoke vapour trail behind the plane

Here you can still see the white smoke vapour trail:
My point is that Cruise Missiles make vapour trails like this, but not always. Another explanation could be that an engine was damaged if and when it hit the light poles. Land and sea based cruise missils have a solid rocket propelent that gives off white smoke like this, the Space Shuttle is a good example of that. So it opens a possibility that perhaps whatever did hit the Pentagon may have had a missile launched or active as hit hit or the object itself was a missile. The first part of the explosion could be the remaining solid rocket propellent or an actual explosive. The fact that there is an absence of black smoke which comes from a jet fuel fire at this point is more evidence that the plane was not on fire prior to hitting the Pentagon wall.

Slide 3

Slide 4

Slide 5
There is some object flying up over the roof but I can't make it out.

The Sound Whoosh:
"'I was right underneath the plane,' said Kirk Milburn, a construction supervisor for Atlantis Co., who was on the Arlington National Cemetery exit of Interstate 395 when he said he saw the plane heading for the Pentagon. I heard a plane. I saw it. I saw debris flying. I guess it was hitting light poles, said Milburn. 'It was like a WHOOOSH whoosh, then there was fire and smoke, then I heard a second explosion.'" (Washington Post)

At least this statement is consistent with what we might expect if the plane hit the light poles. As I was saying earlier if the plane did hit the light poles it would do serious damage to the wing sections affected and would be a fire for sure. Some 757 have tanks in their wings and some don't. I suspect that this plane didn't have tanks or it would have been a fireball for sure. But the double whoosh whoosh sound is interesting in that it corrisponds to some kind of an explosion perhaps before the plane hit the Pentagon. The witness statement above states that he didn't see the plane hit the light poles, just that there was debris flying. I'll keep digging. Anyway have a listen to this.

Listen to this Missile Sound File.
This is a whoosh impact sound - best I can find at the moment
Missile Launching
Listen to the Sound of a Boeing 707 Flying by
Listen to an Military Jet Fighter

My point here is that a whoosh sound is made by explosions not by a plane engine. I guess it depends on the Whoosh type sound, perhaps it might also be a missile launching as well. Dick Eastman seems to think that the plane flew over the Pentagon and landed at a nearby base. Perhaps, it fired off two missiles at the Pentagon and flew over, but if it was being covered by a hologrpahic projection from the C130 that was near by, then who really knows. It is all speculation right now. The only thing we really know is that there is no way a 757 can clip of 5 lamp poles with crashing and exploding into flames and there is no way that it could fit into the hole it made without some massive amounts of wreckage. There are lots of parts on the aircraft that don't burn at 875 degrees, where are they? Just add this to the puzzle for now.

Holographic technology:
Would it be possible to mask a 757 over-top of a missile? Well yes it is possible. Have a look at these links.
When Seeing isn't Believing
NASA's Blue Beam Project

Here is one Witness Statement:
"A huge jet. Then it was gone. Buildings don't eat planes. That plane, it just vanished. There should have been parts on the ground. It should have rained parts on my car. The airplane didn't crash. Where are the parts? There was a plane. It didn't go over the building. It went into the building. I want them to find it whole, wedged between floors or something. I want to make it make sense. I want to know why there's this gap in my memory, this gap that makes it seem as though the plane simply became invisible and banked up at the very last minute"

Wreckage inside the Pentagon:

Now here we have a possible piece of wreckage. Although it looks like it may be off the airplane, I have a few questions about it. It can't be an external part of Flight 77 because there is no painted parts that are white in color on American Airlines color scheme. The second thing is the flag. When was the last time you ever saw a flag painted on a Commercial Jet interior like this? However one thing that we all know is that Military Aircraft have flags painted on them and possibly panted on the inside as well! Another explaination is that it might be an internal door or wall in the pentagon itself. Perhaps a lab or something like that. I thought I bring it forward in case someone recognizes it.

Take note of the internal archetecture here. Not much for steel beams and further there is no aircraft debris.

Walking back in time:
PENTAGON WAS PREPARING FOR CRASH SCENARIO IN NOVEMBER 2000
Amalgam Virgo Exercise + Co.
Mother of All Lies About 9/11 - Barbara Olson's "Phone Call" From Flight 77

Bush to Arrive at the Pentagon 2 Hours After the Crash:
A Fire Truck was taken out and placed near the helipad just prior to the crash into the Pentagon. Reason was that 2 hours after the crash George W. Bush was suppose to arrive there on a scheduled stop.

Question: When does anyone put a fire truck beside a helipad 2 hours before anyone is suppose to be there?
Audio
Transcript

Photo by Jon Culberson

To Perhaps help answer this question, here is an unconfirmed witness report by Wallace. If Wallace could contact me to verify that this is his statement that would be much appreciated. Rob Hay...

Answer:

"As I said, we were expecting President Bush about Noon, which would be a Code One Stand-By. In such situations, one of the problems I see at the heliport is that there are too many people there. Plus, there are many vehicles, including Secret Service, Pentagon SWAT, U.S. Park Police, D.C. Cops on motorcycles, and the two Presidential Limousines. And, some of these vehicles even park in front of the fire station apparatus door, blocking the fire truck from exiting the building! That is why I wanted the crash truck out of the station and parked in a good location, for easy access to the heliport in case of an emergency."

This unconfirmed statement from Alan Wallace now states that the President was to arrive at 12:00 PM and the first flight in to the heliport wasn't until 10:00 AM and the Crash Truck a brand new Titan 3000, Number 161 or 61 was parked by the Helipad.

More Questions:
Where is the 161 or 61 stamped on the side of the Truck?
Is this really a brand new fire truck?
I tried to find a picture on the Net of a Titan 3000 Fire Truck with no luck. Do Titan 3000 exist?
Here is a picture of a differnt Fire Truck with Number 61 stamped on it sitting on the Lawn, fighting the fire.

Here is a Titan Fire Truck being loaded onto a plane. This is the only picture I have a Titan. So it still leaves us with the question of what the number was on the fire truck that got melted from the fire. It is interesting though that a differnt truck would appear that has 61 as well stampped on the side of it. It is unclear if this truck belonged to the Pentagon Fire Department or not, if it did it would certainly raise some questions. I believe that the Titan fire truck was indeed Truck 161 as Wallace refers to it that way a number of times in his statement.

Another interesting conflicting bit of information in Wallace's statement is that the plane flying at about 25 feet above the ground but had hit the Pentagon at a 60 degree angle? He originally thought it was about 45 degrees. Little odd for a plane having an angle of attack greater than 10 degrees being 25 feet off the ground.

"Mark and I continued to mess around the fire truck. The last minute or two before the plane hit the Pentagon, Mark and I were working in the right rear compartment where the foam metering valves are located. Mark told me how, if you had to, you could get as much as 50% foam solution out of the roof turret and discharges. We laughed about cheating the Government out of some foam! Mark and I then walked toward the right front corner of the truck. We were side-by-side, always within an arm’s reach of each other. We had walked past the right front corner of the crash truck (Foam 161) and were maybe 10-15 feet in front of the truck when I looked up towards my left side. I saw a large frame commercial airliner crossing Washington Blvd., heading towards the Pentagon! The plane had two big engines, appeared to be in level flight, and was only approximately 25 feet off the ground and only about 200 YARDS from our location. I later said the plane approached the Pentagon at about a 45 degree angle, but later drawing showed it was closer to 60 degrees. The airplane appeared to be a Boeing 757 or an Air Bus 320- white with blue and orange stripes. Mark later recalled the plane was silver and even identified that it was American Airlines.

So many people think Mark and I watched the plane hit the building. We did NOT. We only saw it approach for an instant. I would estimate not longer than half a second. Others didn’t understand why we didn’t hear it sooner. We did not hear it until right after we saw it. I estimate that the plane hit the building only 1½-2 seconds after we saw it. What I am saying is, immediately after we saw it, we heard the noise; the engines, I’m sure. I described that as a terrible noise – loud, scary, and horrible."

Pentagon Building Defense Analysis:
The Pentagon is one of the most heavily guarded and watched site on the Planet, with some
exceptions to perhaps Area 51 and NORAD.  With Radar systems capable of tracking objects
right down to sea level, Friend or Foe System and Satalite systems it amazes me that flight
that a rogue Boeing 757 could hit the Pentagon with out warning after 2 planes already had
hit the World Trade Center.  The Pentagon is equiped with the latest State of the Art
technology in the War Room.  Stand down orders had to be issued in order to keep the military
from intercepting these planes and you all know who can give that order...

Important links related to the war on terrorism, but not to the Pentagon crash directly:

Interesting links which shed light on Rumsfeld and the Implementation of his military strategy (QDR) in September 2001

Links to Oppinions and Developed Websites:

Developed Websites that examine this in detail:

The Missile Theory Info:

Links that support the Official Story

Spot the Lamp Poles. (Pentagon | 9/11)
Dissecting Disinformation: the "No Boeing 757" Theory
It was a Plane Bomb
Pentagon Attack Plane Was An El Al Look-alike

Eye Witness Accounts - Although unverified:
Urban Legends: Eyewitness accounts of the Flight 77 Crash
Christian Patriots In Action - Pentagon Crash Analysis
Un Boeing 757 s'est-il vraiment écrasé sur le Pentagone le 11 septembre 2001
Pentagon Eyewitness Accounts - Boeing 757 or military craft ?

Balanced Views that look at both sides:
Propagandamatrix - The Pentagon File

Send in more Info! Related Links:
World Trade Center Demolition - Links and Information
Was Flight 93 Shot Down?
Video: The Other Side - September 11th and War on Terrorism

Go the the Freedom files mainpage for other research on 911 and the War on Terrorism

© Copyright Freedom Files Website www.freedomfiles.org ( Rob Hay ) 2003
For fair use only/ pour usage équitable seulement .