Subquantum kinetics is a novel microphysics paradigm that incorporates concepts developed in the fields of system theory and nonequilibrium thermodynamics. One of the distinctive features of subquantum kinetics is that it begins at the subquantum level for its point of departure. By comparison, conventional physics and most alternative physics theories begin with mathematically quantified observations of physical phenomena at the quantum level and attempt to deduce physical theories based on those observations. Since, to proceed in this manner, numerous experimental observations must be taken into account, the end result is a fragmented set of theories that must be later sewn together with mathematical acrobatics. The end result "unified theory" is a patchwork quilt containing numerous contradictions that are summarily dismissed. Instead of beginning with observations at the quantum level, subquantum kinetics begins by postulating a model of well-ordered reaction processes theorized to take place at the subquantum level. It then uses this model to simulate physical structures and phenomena observed to take place at the quantum level (e.g., zero-point energy fluctuations, field potentials, subatomic particles with mass, charge, and spin, force field action, and electromagnetic wave propagation). It then compares the simulated results to quantum level observations to fine-tune the model so that its simulation is realistic. Although various types of functional order may be postulated for these subquantum processes, subquantum kinetics chooses a single best-choice model to work with and to optimize. Because it postulates just one model, subquantum kinetics is unified right from the start and avoids the patchwork quilt pitfall of conventional physics. As a point of departure for choosing an adequate subquantum process model, subquantum kinetics turns to observations of the macroscopic natural world, discerning how ordered forms spontaneously emerge or "self-organize" from a pre-existing substrate. In particular, it focuses on substrates that evolve well-ordered wave patterns, since wave order is a key prerequisite of any realistic microphysics model. For example, certain kinds of nonlinear open reaction systems, systems whose constituents maintain a continual state of reactive flux are found to spontaneously form waves (e.g., chemical waves). Mechanical waves, on the other hand, do not serve as adequate models since they do not arise from substrate level processes. They require a non-spontaneous energy impulse miraculously introduced at the super system level (a là Big Bang). For insight, we turn to a particular two-variable reaction kinetic model known as the Brusselator, which holds the distinction in the field of reaction-kinetics of being an archetypal oscillator that has a simplicity comparable to the simple harmonic oscillator of wave mechanics. To devise a model that would produce a physically realistic quantum level simulation the Brusselator must be subsequently modified into a three-variable reaction system called Model G. Subquantum kinetics presents Model G as a descriptor of subquantum processes that take place in a dynamic subtle substance called the "transmuting ether." This is composed of subtle "etheron" particles that continually react with one another in a prescribed manner and which also diffuse through space. Hence subquantum kinetics applies concepts developed in the well-established field of nonlinear chemical kinetics to the domain of microphysics. The subquantum kinetics paradigm avoids many of the pitfalls of conventional physics and astronomy theories and interprets physical phenomena in a distinctively different manner. A listing of the numerous problems of the conventional paradigm and how subquantum kinetics resolves them is presented in the following tables.
The transmuting ether is the dynamic subtle substance that forms all subatomic particles and energy waves. Matter and energy waves are simply ether concentration patterns -- variations in the concentrations of the G, X, and Y reacting ether substrates. They may be viewed as forming out of the transmuting ether much the same way that chemical wave concentration patterns are formed in the Belousov-Zhabotinskii reaction.
|
There is beauty in simplicity. That part of the transmuting ether that is responsible for generating the physical universe is described by just five irreversible ether reactions (Model G). These describe the recursive conversion of X into Y and Y into X. Under certain conditions, this cycle spontaneously forms reciprocal X and Y ether concentration wave patterns. These comprise the subatomic particles and energy waves that form the basis of the physical world.
Revelation, Chapter 21 |
|
MODEL G
Click here too view the reaction
system layout
(courtesy of Ancientweb)
The transmuting ether is the wellspring of Creation. If this continual activity were to diminish, your physical body, your house, the Earth, the Sun, the countless planets and stars filling the vast expanse of space, in fact, all the subatomic particles and energy waves composing our physical universe would gradually dissipate, disolving into a state of uniformity. What would remain would be the ever-present, vast, and unfathomable multi-dimensional consciousness, of which we are a part, and whose now featureless calm "surface" had once generated our beautiful physical universe. The idea of a transmuting ether with a self-referential process loop (where X produces Y and Y produces X) has very ancient roots. It is the essence of the ancient Chinese yin and yang metaphysics. It is also presented in the metaphysics of the Tarot, astrology, as well as in the symbolism of many ancient creation myths (story of Osiris, myth of Atum, story of Zeus, etc.). This science also survives in the tradition of alchemy. To learn more about this process physics, its ancient origin, and astronomical and cosmological implications, read Beyond the Big Bang by Paul LaViolette.
For a more technical presentation of this physics and its astronomical consequences read Subquantum Kinetics by Paul LaViolette.
Remote viewing of a subatomic particle and its antimatter compliment conducted in 1895 by esoterisists Annie Bessant and Charles Leadbeater. The whirling ether flux, which they saw flowing into and out from the center of the particle matches the predictions of subquantum kinetics.
61324